|
Proceeds to treat of the arguments put forward by the heretics, not
from Scripture, but from their own reason. Those are refuted, who
think the substance of the Father and of the Son to be not the same,
because everything predicated of God is, in their opinion, predicated
of him according to substance; and therefore it follows, that to beget
and to be begotten, or to be begotten and unbegotten, being diverse,
are diverse substances; whereas it is here demonstrated that not
everything predicated of God is predicated according to substance, in
such manner as he is called good and great according to substance, or
anything else that is predicated of him in respect to himself; but that
some things are also predicated of him relatively, i. e. not in
respect to himself, but to something not himself, as he is called
Father in respect to the Son, and Lord in respect to the creature
that serveth him; in which case, if anything thus predicated
relatively, i. e. in respect to something not himself, is even
predicated as happening in time, as e. g. "Lord, thou hast become
our refuge," yet nothing happens to God so as to work a change in
him, but he himself remains absolutely unchangeable in his own nature
or essence.
|
|