|
11. As, therefore, all men will to be blessed, certainly. if
they will truly, they will also to be immortal; for otherwise they
could not be blessed. And further, if questioned also concerning
immortality, as before concerning blessedness, all reply that they
will it. But blessedness of what quality soever, such as is not so,
but rather is so called, is sought, nay indeed is feigned in this
life, whilst immortality is despaired of, without which true
blessedness cannot be. Since he lives blessedly, as we have already
said before, and have sufficiently proved and concluded, who lives as
he wills, and wills nothing wrongly. But no one wrongly wills
immortality, if human nature is by God's gift capable of it; and if
it is not capable of it, it is not capable of blessedness. For, that
a man may live blessedly, he must needs live. And if life quits him
by his dying, how can a blessed life remain with him? And when it
quits him, without doubt it either quits him unwilling, or willing,
or neither. If unwilling, how is the life blessed which is so within
his will as not to be within his power?
And whereas no one is blessed who wills something that he does not
have, how much less is he blessed who is quitted against his will, not
by honor, nor by possessions, nor by any other thing, but by the
blessed life itself, since he will have no life at all? And hence,
although no feeling is left for his life to be thereby miserable (for
the blessed life quits him, because life altogether quits him), yet
he is wretched as long as he feels, because he knows that against his
will that is being destroyed for the sake of which he loves all else,
and which he loves beyond all else. A life therefore cannot both be
blessed, and yet quit a man against his will, since no one becomes
blessed against his will; and hence how much more does it make a man
miserable by quitting him against his will, when it would make him
miserable if he had it against his will! But if it quit him with his
will, even so how was that a blessed life, which he who had it willed
should perish? It remains then for them to say, that neither of these
is in the mind of the blessed man; that is, that he is neither
unwilling nor willing to be quitted by a blessed life, when through,
death life quits him altogether; for that he stands firm with an even
heart, prepared alike for either alternative. But neither is that a
blessed life which is such as to be unworthy of his love whom it makes
blessed. For how is that a blessed life which the blessed man does not
love? Or how is that loved, of which it is received indifferently,
whether it is to flourish or to perish? Unless perhaps the virtues,
which we love in this way on account of blessedness alone, venture to
persuade us that we do not love blessedness itself. Yet if they did
this. we should certainly leave off loving the virtues themselves,
when we do not love that on account of which alone we loved them.
And further, how will that opinion be true, which has been so tried,
and sifted, and thoroughly strained, and is so certain, viz. that
all men will to be blessed, if they themselves who are already blessed
neither will nor do not will to be blessed? Or if they will it, as
truth proclaims, as nature constrains, in which indeed the supremely
good and unchangeably blessed Creator has implanted that will: if, I
say, they will to be blessed who are blessed, certainly they do no
will to be not blessed. But if they do not will not to be blessed,
without doubt they do not will to be annihilated and perish in regard to
their blessedness. But they cannot be blessed except they are alive;
therefore they do not will so to perish in regard to their life.
Therefore, whoever are either truly blessed or desire to be so, will
to be immortal. But he does not live blessedly who has not that which
he wills. Therefore it follows that in no way can life be truly
blessed unless it be eternal.
|
|