|
4. The petty exactitude of these men about syllables and words is
not, as might be supposed, simple and straightforward; nor is the
mischief to which it tends a small one. There is involved a deep and
covert design against true religion Their pertinacious contention is to
show that the mention of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is unlike,
as though they will thence find it easy to demonstrate that there is a
variation in nature. They have an old sophism, invented by Aetius,
the champion of this heresy, in one of whose Letters there is a
passage to the effect that things naturally unlike are expressed in
unlike terms, and, conversely, that things expressed in unlike terms
are naturally unlike. In proof of this statement he drags in the words
of the Apostle, "One God and Father of whom are all things,
... and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things "
"Whatever, then," he goes on, "is the relation of these terms to
one another, such will be the relation of the natures indicated by
them; and as the term 'of whom' is unlike the term 'by whom,' so
is the Father unlike the Son." On this heresy depends the idle
subtilty of these men about the phrases in question. They accordingly
assign to God the Father, as though it were His distinctive portion
anti lot, the phrase "of Whom;" to God the Son they confine the
phrase '" by Whom;" to the Holy Spirit that of "in Whom," and
say that this use of the syllables is never interchanged, in order
that. as I have already said, the variation of language may indicate
the variation of nature. Verily it is sufficiently obvious that in
their quibbling about the words they are endeavouring to maintain the
force of their impious argument.
By the term "of whom" they wish to indicate the Creator; by the
term "through whom," the subordinate agent or instrument; by the
term "in whom," or "in which," they mean to shew the time or
place. The object of all this is that the Creator of the universe may
be regarded as of no higher dignity than an instrument, and that the
Holy Spirit may appear to be adding to existing things nothing more
than the contribution derived from place or time.
|
|
