CHAPTER V: QUESTION 3: THE MODE OF THE UNION ON THE PART OF THE PERSON ASSUMING

[659] For a fuller explanation of this distinction, which is called a virtual minor distinction, see The One God, pp. 168f.; also God, His Existence, II, 203-46. (Tr.)

[660] Cf. IIIa, q. 3, a. I, ad 2, quaestiuncula 3a

[661] Ibid., ad 1

[662] Ibid., ad 3

[663] Ibid., ad 1, ad 2, ad 3.

[664] Cf. ad 2.

[665] Cf. Ia, q. 3, a. 3

[666] Cf. IIIa, q. 3, a. 2, 4

[667] Denz., no. 285

[668] Cf. IIIa, q. 3, a. 3, ad 1, ad 2.

[669] Ibid., a. 1, ad 2. See also Penido, Le role de l'analogie en theologie dogmatique, PP 337f.

[670] The Deity is not communicated internally inasmuch as it is terminated by paternity. Thus in the figure that represents the Holy Trinity, in the equilateral triangle, the first angle that is formed communicates indeed to the second and third angles its superficies, but not itself, nor its superficies so far as this latter is terminated by itself. Thus it is that this same superficies is terminated by the three angles that are really distinct from one another and are not really distinct from their common superficies

[671] Summa theol., Ia, q. 32, a. 2

[672] Ibid., a. 1

[673] Denz., no. 282. See also no. 422, profession of faith enjoined upon the Waldensians

[674] The entire reply should be read

[675] Cf. ad 8.

[676] Consult the Thomist theologians for the solution of the objections raised by Scotus

[677] Cf. ad 3, which should read: "It would not be necessary (non oporteret), " according to the Leonine edition.

[678] Cf. Summa theol., Ia, q. 36, a. 4, ad 2; q. 39, a. 3; IIIa, q. 3, a. 6, ad 1; a. 7, ad 2.

[679] This analogy enables us to see more clearly that adoptive sonship is a certain participated likeness of eternal natural sonship. See a. 5, ad 2, of this question. St. Paul expresses the same analogy in the following text: "God predestinated us to be made conformable to the image of His Son. that He might be the first-born among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29).

[680] Read the text of St. Thomas, the second reason

[681] Rom. 8:29.

[682] Com. in Ep. ad Rom

[683] Cf. supra, a. 5, ad 2.

[684] Ibid., IIIa, q 23, a. 1

[685] Ibid., a. 2.

[686] Ibid., ad 3. Cf. Ia, q. 93, a. 4, ad. 2; IIa IIae, q. 45, a. 6; IIIa, q. 3, a. 5, ad 2; a. 8; q. 39, a. 8, ad 3; q. 45, a. 4