|
We treat this subject briefly under three headings:
|
1. Subsistence of the separated soul.
2. Knowledge of the separated soul.
3. The will of the separated soul.
|
|
1. Subsistence
The continued subsistence of the separated soul may be thus
demonstrated. Every form which, in its being, in its specific
activity, and in its production, is intrinsically independent of
matter, can subsist, and in fact, does subsist, independently of
matter. But the human soul is such a form, intrinsically independent
of matter. Hence, after the dissolution of the human body, the human
soul continues to subsist.
The Averroistic question was this: How can the soul, separated from
the matter which gave it individuality, remain individualized, that
is, remain as the soul of Peter rather than the soul of Paul? It
remains individualized, answers St. Thomas, by its essential,
transcendental relation to that human body which originally gave it
individuation, even though that body is now buried in the dust. Were
this relation merely accidental, then it would disappear with the
disappearance of its terminus, as does, e. g.: the relation of a
father's paternity when his son dies. But the separated soul is
individualized by its relation to an individual body, a relation
comparable to that between the soul and the living body, and this
relation remains in the separated soul, which by that relation remains
individualized. Thus St. Thomas against the Averroists, who,
holding that the soul is individualized only by actual union with
matter, went on to say pantheistically that all men together have but
one immortal and impersonal soul. [676] .
We must note that soul and body form a natural composite, which is
one, not per accidens, but per se. Were the human soul united only
accidentally to the body, then it would have only an accidental
relation to its body, which relation could not remain after the
dissolution of the body. Quite otherwise is the case if the human soul
is by nature the form of the body.
Here we may again see how faithful St. Thomas is to the principle of
economy, which he himself thus formulates: [677] When fewer
principles suffice, search not for more. In the present treatise too
he draws all conclusions from principles, very profound but very few.
The saint is thus responsible for great progress in the unification of
theological knowledge.
Let us note briefly a few more of these consequences. First, it is
more perfect for the human soul to be united to the body than to be
separated, because its connatural object lies in the sense objects to
know which it needs the sense faculties. [678] Second, the
separated soul has a natural desire to be reunited to its body, a
conclusion in harmony with the dogma of universal corporeal
resurrection. [679] Third, the separated soul cannot by its
will be reunited to its body, because it informs the body, not by its
voluntary operation, but by its very nature. [680] .
2. Knowledge [681]
Sense operations and sense habits do not remain actually in the
separated soul, but only radically (i. e.: in their root and
principle). What it does actually retain are, first, its immaterial
faculties (intellect and will): second, the habits it acquired on
earth, habits of knowledge, for example, and third, the actual
exercise of these habits, that of reason, for example. Yet the
separated soul finds itself impeded in this exercise, because it no
longer has the actual cooperation of the imagination and the sense
memory. But it receives from God infused ideas comparable to those of
the angels. To illustrate, we may compare its state to that of a
theologian who, unable to keep in touch with new publications in his
science, receives illuminations from on high.
Sometimes we find an emphasis on this last point, an emphasis which
neglects another truth, very certain and very important, namely, that
the separated soul knows itself directly, without medium. [682]
This truth carries with it many other truths. By this immediate
self-knowledge, it sees with perfect evidence its own native
spirituality, its immortality, its freedom. It sees also that God
is the author of its nature. It thus knows God, no longer in the
sense world as mirror, but as mirrored in its own spiritual essence.
Hence it sees with transcendent evidence the solution of the great
philosophic problems, and the absurdity of materialism, determinism,
and pantheism. Further, separated souls have knowledge of one another
and also of the angels, though their knowledge of the latter is less
perfect, since the angels belong by nature to a higher order of
things.
Does the separated soul know what is happening on earth? Not in the
natural order. But in the supernatural order, God manifests to the
blessed in heaven such events on earth as have a special relation to
their blessed state, as, for instance, the question of sanctification
of living persons for whom the blessed are praying. [683] .
3. The Will
Every separated soul, so faith teaches us, has a will immutably fixed
in relation to its last end. For this truth St. Thomas gives a
profound reason. The soul, in whatever state, he says, thinks of
its last end rightly or wrongly according to its interior disposition.
Now as long as the soul is united to the body, this disposition can
change. But when the soul is separated, since it is no longer tending
to its last end, it is no longer on the road (in via) to its good,
but has obtained its goal, unless it has missed it eternally. Hence
its dispositions at the moment of separation remain immovably fixed
either in good or in evil. [684] Here again we see the harmony
between dogma and reason, between revelation on the immutability of the
separated soul and the doctrine that the soul is the form of the body.
Concluding, St. Thomas, [685] shows that man, first by his
intellectual nature, secondly by grace, thirdly by the light of
glory, is made to the image of God. Is man also an image of the
Trinity? Yes, by his soul, which is the principle from which
proceed both thought and then love.
|
|