|
[240] l'Evolution homogene du dogme catholique, Paris, 2nd
ed.: French trans.: 1924, II, 333.
[241] Introductio in historiam dogmatum, Paris, 1922,
pp. 128, 115-49, 170-73, 185, 192-210.
[242] De revelatione, Rome, 1918, I, 18, 20,
189 ff. ; De Deo uno, Paris, 1938, pp. 43-49
[243] Essai sur le probleme theologique (Bibliotheque
Orientations): Belgium, 1938, pp. 66, 121, 123,
135.
[244] Ibid.: pp. 137-41
[245] See note 3. Cf. Gagnebet, in Rev. thom.:
1939, pp. 108-47
[246] This paragraph summarizes the first question in the
Summa. See Ia, q. 1, a. 6.
[247] Clare visa
[248] Obscure per fidem cognita
[249] Ego sum qui sum
[250] Deus solus est ipsum esse subsistens
[251] Bk. 1, lect. 4; Scire est cognoscere causam propter
quam res est et non potest aliter se habere
[252] Cf. R. Gagnebet, O. P.: "La nature de la
theologie speculative" in Rev. thom.: 1938, nos. 1 and 2,
p. 78; 1939, pp. 108-47
[253] Radix ejus est ipsa fides infusa
[254] Ia, q. 1, a. 6, 8, 9.
[255] Sufficit defendere non esse impossibile quod praedicat
fides. Ia, q. 32, a. 1
[256] IIIa, q. 1, a. 1.
[257] Ia, q. 32, a. 1, ad 2
[258] Haec non possunt nec probari nec improbari, sed cum
probabilitate suadentur et sola fide cum certitudine tenentur
[259] Matt. 16: 18
[260] Doctrina fidei
[261] Matt. 26: 39.
[262] Fides quaerens intellectum
[263] Cf. Gagnebet, O. P.: "La nature de la theologie
speculative," Rev. thom.: 1938, nos. 1 and 2.
[264] Cf. Salmanticenses, Cursus theol.: de tide, disp.
1, dub. 4, no. 127
[265] See Salmanticenses (loc. cit.: no. 124): who
rightly cite as defenders of their thesisa series of Thomists,
Capreolus, Cajetan, Banez, John of St. Thomas, and others,
against Vega, Vasquez, Suarez, and Lugo. Cf. Dict. theol.
cath.: s. v. Explicite et Implicite and s. v. Dogme
[266] Ad aliquam Deo dante mysteriorum intelligentiam, eamque
fructuosissimam Denz.: no. 1796
[267] Bk. II, lect. 3-17
|
|
