|
[553] De Trinitate, V, chap. 4, 5.
[554] Ps. 2:7.
[555] Acts 13:33; Heb. 1:5; 5:5.
[556] John 15:26
[557] Ibid., 8:42.
[558] Cf. above, q. 27
[559] Summa Theol., Ia, q. 45, a. 2 ad 2
[560] With regard to the consequent will, the antecedent
will is so called inasmuch as it is founded on the first
consideration of good taken absolutely and not on the
second consideration of the same good to be produced here
and now. For example, for the merchant caught in a storm
it is a good thing to save his goods taken absolutely, but
here and now it may be a good thing to throw his goods
overboard. The good does not exist except here and now
and hence is not affected by the antecedent will as
distinct from the consequent will
[561] Summa Theol., Ia, q. 19, a. 6 ad 1
[562] De Synodis, I, 25
[563] In the argument sed contra
[564] Summa Theol., Ia, q. 19, a. 3
[565] Ibid., Ia IIae, q. 5, a. 4
[566] Cf. Cajetan, op. cit
[567] Rom. 8:32.
[568] John 1:18
[569] Cajetan, Commentary on IIIa, q. 4, a. 2
[570] This text ought to be quoted in support of
Cajetan's doctrine on personality; cf. ibid
[571] Summa Theol., Ia, q. 50, a. 4. Cf.
the Commentary of John of St. Thomas and of Gonet,
De unitate intellectus (ed. Lethielleux, 1875),
p. 465.
|
|