|
[199] A. Michel, "Relations et personnes divines"
in Dict. theol. cath.
[200] Question 29, art. 4.
[201] Council of Florence; cf. Denz., no. 703
[202] St. Thomas, De potentia, q. 7, a. 9.
[203] Categ., chap. 5; Met., V, 15.
[204] Categ., chap. 5
[205] Contra Gentes, Bk. IV, chap. 14
[206] De potentia, q. 7, a. 9 ad 7
[207] Every accident inheres at least aptitudinally in
the subject. This aptitude remains in the Eucharistic
accidents, which are without any subject. According to
the laws of nature, however, an accident is also actually
in the subject. Miraculously this is not verified in the
Eucharistic accidents.
[208] Summa, IIIa, q. 2, a. 7.
[209] Denz., nos. 40, 60, 85, 231, 271
[210] Rouet de Journel, Ench. patrist., Index
theologicus, no. 178, where a collection of
references to the Greek and Latin Fathers will be found
[211] Orat. 30, no. 16; Journel, no. 990
[212] Journel, Index theologicus, no. 178
[213] See especially De Trinitate, V, 6.
[214] Tixeront, Histoire des dogmes (8th ed.;
1924), II, 365 f.
[215] St. Augustine, De Trinitate, V, vi, 16;
ibid., VII, xxiv; De civitate Dei, XI, x,
1. 18 Denz., nos. 278, 280, 281.
Similarly in the Council of Reims (1148),
Denz., no. 389; the Fourth Lateran Council,
Denz., no. 432; the Council of Florence,
Denz., no. 703.
[216] Denz., no. 703
[217] Cf. Harduin, Concil. Collectio, IX,
203
[218] Ibid., IX, 339. Cf. St. Anselm, De
proc. Spir. Sancti, chap. 2
[219] St. Thomas, I Sent., 26, 33; Contra
Gentes, IV, 14; De potentia, q. 2, a. 6;
q. 8, a. 1
[220] Boetius, De Trin., chap. 6. Cf. art. 3
below
[221] St. Thomas, De potentia, q. 2, a. 2 and
5
[222] Ibid., q. 7, a. 9 ad 7.
[223] Denz., no. 390
[224] Ibid., no. 391
[225] Summa, Ia, q. 13, a. 12; q. 3, a.
3.
[226] Denz, no. 431
[227] Ibid., no. 523
[228] Summa, Ia, q. 3, a. 6.
[229] Billot. th. 8
[230] St. Thomas, Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 1;
De potentia, q. 7, a. 9, no. 7.
[231] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2
[232] Summa, IIIa, q. 17, a. 2 ad 3
[233] De mysterio Sanctissimae Trinitatis, Bk.
IV, chap. 3.
[234] Cf. a. 3 ad 2, 3 below
[235] Loc. cit.
[236] Cf. Cajetan, Ia, q. 39, a. 1, no. 8
[237] Ibid., no. 7
[238] Summa, Ia, q. 27, a. 2 ad 3; q. 28,
a. 2 ad 3
[239] Cajetan, op. cit., Ia, q. 39, a. 1
[240] Ibid., Ia, q. 39, a. 1, no. 7.
[241] Ibid., no. 8.
[242] Summa, IIIa, q. 17, a. 2 ad 3; De
potentia, q. 8, a. 2 ad 11; q. 9, a. 5 ad
10
[243] Summa, IIIa, q. 17, a. 2.
[244] Exod. 3:14
[245] St. Augustine, De Trin., V, 8
[246] Summa, Ia, q. 42, a. 4 ad 2.
[247] De potentia, q. 2, a. 5.
[248] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2
[249] Cf. Bossuet, "Dieu n'est pas plus grand pour
avoir cree l'univers."
[250] Cajetan on Ia, q. 19, a. 2, no. 3
[251] Cajetan, IIIa, q. 1, a. 1, no. 6
[252] Garrigou-Lagrange, The One God, p. 500
[253] St. Augustine, De Trinitate, Bk. VI,
chap. 8; Bk. VIII, chap. 1
[254] Cf. below, p. 170
[255] Denz., no. 703
[256] Harduin, Conciliorum Collectio, IX, 203.
[257] Ibid., IX, 339. For earlier councils,
cf. Eleventh Council of Toledo and Fourth Council of
the Lateran, Denz., 39, 231, 281, 523 f
[258] St. Anselm, De process. Spiritus Sancti,
chap. 2 (Migne, PL, 158, 288).
[259] De Trinitate, V, XV
[260] Cf. Rouet de Journel, Ench. patrist.,
Index theologicus, no. 148. Many references to the
texts of the Greek and Latin Fathers quoted in this work
will be found here
[261] De potentia, q. 7, a. 8 ad 4.
[262] The term "opposition" often causes
equivocations. Thus the rationalists say that reason and
Christian faith are opposed, by which they mean that
Christian faith is against reason. Actually faith is
above reason, and a mutual relation exists between faith
and reason, as the Vatican Council explains. Cf.
Denz., nos. 1795, 1800
[263] Cajetan, Ia, q. 39, a. 1, no. 7.
[264] St. Thomas, In I Sent., d. 2, q. 1,
a. 5 ad 4
[265] St. Thomas, De potentia, q. 2, a. 5
[266] Cf. Disp. metaph., Dist., X, 3, 14
[267] Suarez, De Trinitate, Bk. IV, chap. 3,
no. 7
[268] Summa, IIIa, q. 17, a. 2 ad 3
[269] Suarez, De myst. SS. Trinitatis, Bk.
III, chap. 5. For a criticism of Suarez'
position, see L. Billot, S.J., Th. VIII,
Epilogus, and N. del Prado, O.P., De veritate
fundamentali philosophiae christianae (1911), pp.
529-44.
[270] Del Prado, O.P., ibid., p. 540
[271] See below, the recapitulation of this question
[272] It is true that relation may refer to quality, as
for instance in the relation of similarity. But in God
quality is reduced to the divine essence, which is
numerically the same in the three persons
[273] Summa, Ia, q. 30, a. 2 ad 1.
[274] Ibid., q. 36, a. 3 ad 2
[275] Ibid., q. 42, a. 1. ad 4
[276] Del Prado, op. cit., p. 543
|
|