|
[1] Adversus Praxeam, chap. 31
[2] De Trinitate, Bk. VIII.
[3] Contra Arianos
[4] Contra Eunomium
[5] V orationes theologicae
[6] Contra Eunomium
[7] De Trinitate
[8] De Trinitate
[9] De S. Trinitate
[10] De Trinitate
[11] De fide Trinitatis
[12] De Trinitate
[13] De Trinitate
[14] De unitate Trinitatis
[15] Dogmatik, De SS. Trin., in fine
[16] De Regnon, Etudes de theologie positive sur la
Trinite
[17] Origines du dogme de la Trinite (Paris:
Beauchesne, 1910, 1927).
[18] Martinus Jugie, A. A., De processione
Spiritus Sancti
[19] cf. the treatises on the Trinity by Billot,
Billuart, Delatte, Diekamp, Franzelin, Hugon,
Janssens, John of St. Thomas, Jungmann,
Lepicier, Pesch, Salmanticenses, Suarez,
Tanquerey, Van Noort, and Van der Meersch; the
articles, "Processions divines," "Relations et
personnes divines," "Pere," "Fils de Dieu,"
"Filioque," "Esprit Saint," in Dict. theol.
cath.
[20] cf. Scheeben, De Trinitate, no. 1086
[21] Ia, q. 39, a. 1
[22] Denz., no. 2026
[23] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 2 ad 3
[24] ibid., q. 19, a. 2
[25] Contra Gentes, Bk. I, chap. 3
[26] Summa, Ia, q. 1, a. 6
[27] ibid., IIIa, q. 3, a. 5 ad 2; q. 23,
a. 2 ad 3. Garrigou-Lagrange, "La grace est-elle
une participation de la Deite telle qu'elle est en
soi?" Revue thomiste, July, 1936, pp.
470-86.
[28] Rom. 8 29
[29] Summa, IIa, q. 99, n. 1, a. 1
[30] Contra Gentes, Bk. IV, chap. 1.
[31] Ethica, Bk. X, chap. 7
[32] Contra Gentes, Bk. I, chap. 5
[33] John 15:15
[34] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 28, a. 1, 3, 4
[35] Col. 2:2.
[36] Denz., no. 1021.
[37] Rom. 8:29; cf. Summa, IIIa, q. 3, a.
5 ad 2; q. 23, a. 2 ad 3.
[38] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 3
[39] I Cor. 2:6-9
[40] Denz., Index systematicus, n. V, a, b.
[41] Denz., nos. 428, 432
[42] ibid., nos. 281, 431, 523, 703
[43] ibid., no. 428
[44] ibid., no. 691
[45] ibid., no. 279
[46] Summa, Ia, q. 13, a. 12
[47] Page 96
[48] Catechismum Conc. Trid. ad parochos, Part I,
chap. 4, no. 3; chap. 2, no. 14
[49] cf. Tixeront, Histoire des dogmes, I, 127
f., 179 f., 313, 406; II, 22; III,
107
[50] Denz., Damnatio Sabellianismi, nos. 48,
60, 85, 231, 271, 705.
[51] cf. Mainage, Les principes de la theosophie
[52] John:1.
[53] Denz., no. 54
[54] Tixeront, op. cit., II, 67-76
[55] For the principal declarations against Arius and the
Arians, cf. Denz., nos. 54, 57, 61,
223, 271, 708, 1460
[56] Denz., nos. 74, 85, also 58, 62,
85, 223, 271, 705, 1461
[57] Hurter, Nomenclator 3, I, 466, no. 2
[58] St. Anselm, De fide Trinitatis, PL,
CLVIII, 259-84.
[59] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2.
[60] Denz., no. 389.
[61] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2
[62] Denz., no. 432
[63] ibid., no. 703
[64] ibid., no. 1655
[65] ibid., nos. 2022 f., 2026, 2054
[66] Lib. de persona et de duabus naturis
[67] cf. St. Basil, Epist. 38, 1, 3, 4;
PG, XXXII, 325 f.
[68] cf. Leontius, Contra Nestorium et Eutichet,
PG, LXXXVI, 1280 f.
[69] Summa, Ia, q. 29, a. 1, 2; IIIa, q.
2, a. 2 ad 3; Quaestiones disp., De potentia,
q. 9, a. 1, 4
[70] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 2, a. . 2
[71] cf. Tanquerey, Herve, and Scheeben
[72] cf. P. F. Ceuppens, Theologia biblica
(Rome, 1938); Mysterium SS. Trinitatis in
A. T., pp. 1-53; Mysterium SS. Trinitatis
in N. T., in Synopticis, pp. 54-97; in
Actibus Apostolorum, pp. 98-110 apud S.
Paulum, pp. 111-54 apud S. Joannem, pp.
154-244
[73] Ceuppens, op. cit., p. 57
[74] ibid
[75] For the authenticity of this text in this
controversy, cf. Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 60 f.
cf. Lebreton, Les origines du dogme de la Trinite
(1927), I, 600. Loisy was forced to admit:
"L'emploi de cette formule est atteste dans la
Didache, VII, 1, et l'on peut croire qu'elle
etait universellement recue dans les Eglises au
commencement du IIe siecle" (Les EvangiIes
Synoptiques, II, 751).
[76] Denz., no. 2198
[77] Harnack says 78-83 or even 60-70. cf.
Die Apostelgeschichte (1908), p. 221
[78] cf. the commentaries of St. Augustine, St.
Thomas, Maldonatus, Calmes, and Voste, Studia
Joannea (Rome, 1930), pp. 29-100;
Lebreton, op. cit. (6th ed., 1927).
[79] cf. Knabenbauer, Calmes, Sales
[80] cf. Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 95-97,
108-10, 147, 166, 228
[81] ibid., p. 97
[82] ibid., p. 109
[83] ibid., p. 150
[84] Lebreton, op. cit., p. 423: "Malgre la
proximite du nom neutre to pneuma, S. Jean se sert
toujours du pronom masculin ekeinos pour designer le Saint
Esprit..... Il perd de vue le terme grammatical
qu'il a choisi, et ne voit que la personne qu'il
decrit."
[85] Summa, IIIa, q. 10, a. 2 ad 1.
[86] Denz-, no. 248
[87] cf. the testimonies of the Fathers in Petavius,
Bk. II, chap. 7; Lebreton, op. cit., pp.
441 f.; Lagrange, Revue biblique (1896), p.
387: "Le mystere de la Trinite n'est pas
expressement indique, mais il donne la meilleure
explication de cette tournure de ce pluriel, surtout de:
nus ex nobis."
[88] Roman Breviary, second response, Quinquagesima
Sunday
[89] cf. Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis in A.
Test. (Rome, 1935), pp. 135f., 145
f., 163 f., 235 f.; Theologia biblica SS.
Trinitatis (1938), pp. 16-42
[90] Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis, pp. 135
f., 145 f.
[91] Mark 12:36; Matt. 22:44; Luke
20:42 f
[92] Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis, pp. 163
f.
[93] St. Augustine, Enarr. in Psalm. II, 6
[94] St. Thomas, Commentarium in Psalmum II, 5;
Commentarium in Matt. XXII, 43, with reference
to psalm 109.
[95] Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 235 f.; see also
Condamin, Feldmann, Hoonacker, Lagrange, Desnoyers
[96] Lebreton, op. cit., pp. 110 f.; Contra
Gentes, IV, 8
[97] Lebreton, op. cit., p. 118
[98] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 2, a. 3.
[99] ibid., a. 8
[100] ibid., Ia, q. 34, a. 1. ad 1. cf. such
commentators on St. Thomas as Gotti, Billuart, and
Hugon. cf. also Dict. de theol. cath., articles
"Pere," "Fils de Dieu," "Filioque," "Esprit
Saint, Divinite," "Procession divine,"
"Relations et personnes divines."
[101] Adversus Praxeam, chap. 26
[102] Contra haereses, I, x, 1
[103] Denz., nos. 1 f., 13 f.
[104] Eph. 1:1-14
[105] Ed. Funk
[106] Ed. Duchesne, I, 129
[107] Nos. 24, 26.
[108] Ad Eph., IX, 1; ad Magnesios, XIII,
1.
[109] Contra Noetum, 8
[110] Tertullian, Adversus Praxeam, chaps. 2, 13
[111] Origen, In Joannem, II, 6; XXXII,
18, PG, XIV, 132, 821.
[112] St. Thomas, In Prologum Ev. sec. Joannem,
on the first verse
[113] Origen, Selecta in psalmos, hom. XIII,
134; In Matt., XIV, 7; In Epistolam ad
Hebraeos, PG, XIV, 1308, quoted by
Tanquerey, Synopsis major, p. 383.
[114] Denz-, nos. 48-51
[115] ibid., no. 54
[116] St. Athanasius, Adversus Arianos rationes;
cf. Rouet de Journel, Ench. patrist., nos. 675
f., 753, 760 f.
[117] St. Athanasius, Contra Arianos, I, 16,
39; II, 69; I Epist. ad Serapion, 17
(Tixeront, Hist. dogm., II, 67-96).
[118] Marin Sola, Evolution homogene du dogme
catholique, I, no. 202
[119] St. Robert Bellarmine, De Verbo Dei,
III, 10.
[120] I, Ep. ad Serapionem, 17. Denz., nos.
74, 86
[121] cf. de Regnon, S.J., Etudes de theologie
positive sur la Sainte Trinite (1892-98) Part
I, 251, II; P. Jugie, Theologia dogmatica
Christianorum orientalium, III, 221 f.; A.
d'Ales, De Trinitate; Penido, Role de l'analogie
en theol. dogm. (1931), p. 295, Galtier,
De Trinitate, p. 164, n. 1
[122] St. Athanasius, Adversus Arianos, III,
35 ff.
[123] ibid., 35 f.; St. John Damascene, De
fide orthodoxa, I, 8.
[124] Summa, Ia, q. 39, a. 8
[125] De Trinitate. Bks. IX, X.
[126] Summa, Ia, q. 27, a. 2.
[127] ibid., a. 4.
[128] Denz., nos. 77 ff., 254, 281,
284, 421, 428.
[129] ibid., no. 703; cf. St. Augustine, De
Trinitate, XV, chap. 4, n. 5
[130] Summa, Ia, q. 34, a. 1 ad 3
[131] cf. below, question 37, article 2.
[132] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 235-332,
308 f., 313
[133] Summa Ia, q. 5, a. 2
[134] Richard, De Trinitate, III, PL,
CXCVI, 916 f.
[135] St. Gregory the Great, Hom. 17.
[136] Richard, loc. cit.
[137] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 2; De
veritate, q. 10, a. 4; De potentia, q. 8, a.
3
[138] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 287
[139] ibid., II, 326
[140] Alexander of Hales, Summa theologica, Ia, q.
42, m. 1; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 373
f.
[141] Alexander of Hales, op. cit., Ia, q. 42,
m. 2
[142] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 382
[143] Peter Bles, PL, CCVII, 933
[144] William of Auxerre, Summa, I, chap. 2
[145] St. Bonaventure, I Sent., dist. 10, a.
1, q. I; cf. Rousselot, Pour l'histoire du
probleme de l'amour au Moyen-Age, p. 65.
[146] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 2; De
veritate, q. 10, a. 4; De pot., q. 8, a. 3
[147] St. Bonaventure, op. cit., Ia, dist. 9,
a. 1, q. I; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 457
[148] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 461, 467
f., 493, 506
[149] St. Bonaventure, op. cit., Ia, dist. 9,
a. 1, q. I; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 507
[150] Summa, Ia, q. 5, a. 4 ad 2; Ia IIae,
q. 1, a. 4 ad 1.
[151] ibid., IIIa, q. 1, a. 1
[152] ibid., Ia, q. 19, a. 2.
[153] ibid., IIIa, q. 73, a. 5 ad 3.
[154] ibid., Ia, q. 27, a. 5 ad 2; Ia, q.
27, a. 1 ad 2.
[155] cf. especially q. 27, a. 1. ad 2.
|
|