ENDNOTES


THE TRINITY

[1] Adversus Praxeam, chap. 31

[2] De Trinitate, Bk. VIII.

[3] Contra Arianos

[4] Contra Eunomium

[5] V orationes theologicae

[6] Contra Eunomium

[7] De Trinitate

[8] De Trinitate

[9] De S. Trinitate

[10] De Trinitate

[11] De fide Trinitatis

[12] De Trinitate

[13] De Trinitate

[14] De unitate Trinitatis

[15] Dogmatik, De SS. Trin., in fine

[16] De Regnon, Etudes de theologie positive sur la Trinite

[17] Origines du dogme de la Trinite (Paris: Beauchesne, 1910, 1927).

[18] Martinus Jugie, A. A., De processione Spiritus Sancti

[19] cf. the treatises on the Trinity by Billot, Billuart, Delatte, Diekamp, Franzelin, Hugon, Janssens, John of St. Thomas, Jungmann, Lepicier, Pesch, Salmanticenses, Suarez, Tanquerey, Van Noort, and Van der Meersch; the articles, "Processions divines," "Relations et personnes divines," "Pere," "Fils de Dieu," "Filioque," "Esprit Saint," in Dict. theol. cath.

[20] cf. Scheeben, De Trinitate, no. 1086

[21] Ia, q. 39, a. 1

[22] Denz., no. 2026

[23] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 2 ad 3

[24] ibid., q. 19, a. 2

[25] Contra Gentes, Bk. I, chap. 3

[26] Summa, Ia, q. 1, a. 6

[27] ibid., IIIa, q. 3, a. 5 ad 2; q. 23, a. 2 ad 3. Garrigou-Lagrange, "La grace est-elle une participation de la Deite telle qu'elle est en soi?" Revue thomiste, July, 1936, pp. 470-86.

[28] Rom. 8 29

[29] Summa, IIa, q. 99, n. 1, a. 1

[30] Contra Gentes, Bk. IV, chap. 1.

[31] Ethica, Bk. X, chap. 7

[32] Contra Gentes, Bk. I, chap. 5

[33] John 15:15

[34] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 28, a. 1, 3, 4

[35] Col. 2:2.

[36] Denz., no. 1021.

[37] Rom. 8:29; cf. Summa, IIIa, q. 3, a. 5 ad 2; q. 23, a. 2 ad 3.

[38] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 3

[39] I Cor. 2:6-9

[40] Denz., Index systematicus, n. V, a, b.

[41] Denz., nos. 428, 432

[42] ibid., nos. 281, 431, 523, 703

[43] ibid., no. 428

[44] ibid., no. 691

[45] ibid., no. 279

[46] Summa, Ia, q. 13, a. 12

[47] Page 96

[48] Catechismum Conc. Trid. ad parochos, Part I, chap. 4, no. 3; chap. 2, no. 14

[49] cf. Tixeront, Histoire des dogmes, I, 127 f., 179 f., 313, 406; II, 22; III, 107

[50] Denz., Damnatio Sabellianismi, nos. 48, 60, 85, 231, 271, 705.

[51] cf. Mainage, Les principes de la theosophie

[52] John:1.

[53] Denz., no. 54

[54] Tixeront, op. cit., II, 67-76

[55] For the principal declarations against Arius and the Arians, cf. Denz., nos. 54, 57, 61, 223, 271, 708, 1460

[56] Denz., nos. 74, 85, also 58, 62, 85, 223, 271, 705, 1461

[57] Hurter, Nomenclator 3, I, 466, no. 2

[58] St. Anselm, De fide Trinitatis, PL, CLVIII, 259-84.

[59] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2.

[60] Denz., no. 389.

[61] Summa, Ia, q. 28, a. 2

[62] Denz., no. 432

[63] ibid., no. 703

[64] ibid., no. 1655

[65] ibid., nos. 2022 f., 2026, 2054

[66] Lib. de persona et de duabus naturis

[67] cf. St. Basil, Epist. 38, 1, 3, 4; PG, XXXII, 325 f.

[68] cf. Leontius, Contra Nestorium et Eutichet, PG, LXXXVI, 1280 f.

[69] Summa, Ia, q. 29, a. 1, 2; IIIa, q. 2, a. 2 ad 3; Quaestiones disp., De potentia, q. 9, a. 1, 4

[70] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 2, a. . 2

[71] cf. Tanquerey, Herve, and Scheeben

[72] cf. P. F. Ceuppens, Theologia biblica (Rome, 1938); Mysterium SS. Trinitatis in A. T., pp. 1-53; Mysterium SS. Trinitatis in N. T., in Synopticis, pp. 54-97; in Actibus Apostolorum, pp. 98-110 apud S. Paulum, pp. 111-54 apud S. Joannem, pp. 154-244

[73] Ceuppens, op. cit., p. 57

[74] ibid

[75] For the authenticity of this text in this controversy, cf. Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 60 f. cf. Lebreton, Les origines du dogme de la Trinite (1927), I, 600. Loisy was forced to admit: "L'emploi de cette formule est atteste dans la Didache, VII, 1, et l'on peut croire qu'elle etait universellement recue dans les Eglises au commencement du IIe siecle" (Les EvangiIes Synoptiques, II, 751).

[76] Denz., no. 2198

[77] Harnack says 78-83 or even 60-70. cf. Die Apostelgeschichte (1908), p. 221

[78] cf. the commentaries of St. Augustine, St. Thomas, Maldonatus, Calmes, and Voste, Studia Joannea (Rome, 1930), pp. 29-100; Lebreton, op. cit. (6th ed., 1927).

[79] cf. Knabenbauer, Calmes, Sales

[80] cf. Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 95-97, 108-10, 147, 166, 228

[81] ibid., p. 97

[82] ibid., p. 109

[83] ibid., p. 150

[84] Lebreton, op. cit., p. 423: "Malgre la proximite du nom neutre to pneuma, S. Jean se sert toujours du pronom masculin ekeinos pour designer le Saint Esprit..... Il perd de vue le terme grammatical qu'il a choisi, et ne voit que la personne qu'il decrit."

[85] Summa, IIIa, q. 10, a. 2 ad 1.

[86] Denz-, no. 248

[87] cf. the testimonies of the Fathers in Petavius, Bk. II, chap. 7; Lebreton, op. cit., pp. 441 f.; Lagrange, Revue biblique (1896), p. 387: "Le mystere de la Trinite n'est pas expressement indique, mais il donne la meilleure explication de cette tournure de ce pluriel, surtout de: nus ex nobis."

[88] Roman Breviary, second response, Quinquagesima Sunday

[89] cf. Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis in A. Test. (Rome, 1935), pp. 135f., 145 f., 163 f., 235 f.; Theologia biblica SS. Trinitatis (1938), pp. 16-42

[90] Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis, pp. 135 f., 145 f.

[91] Mark 12:36; Matt. 22:44; Luke 20:42 f

[92] Ceuppens, De prophetiis messianicis, pp. 163 f.

[93] St. Augustine, Enarr. in Psalm. II, 6

[94] St. Thomas, Commentarium in Psalmum II, 5; Commentarium in Matt. XXII, 43, with reference to psalm 109.

[95] Ceuppens, op. cit., pp. 235 f.; see also Condamin, Feldmann, Hoonacker, Lagrange, Desnoyers

[96] Lebreton, op. cit., pp. 110 f.; Contra Gentes, IV, 8

[97] Lebreton, op. cit., p. 118

[98] Summa, IIa IIae, q. 2, a. 3.

[99] ibid., a. 8

[100] ibid., Ia, q. 34, a. 1. ad 1. cf. such commentators on St. Thomas as Gotti, Billuart, and Hugon. cf. also Dict. de theol. cath., articles "Pere," "Fils de Dieu," "Filioque," "Esprit Saint, Divinite," "Procession divine," "Relations et personnes divines."

[101] Adversus Praxeam, chap. 26

[102] Contra haereses, I, x, 1

[103] Denz., nos. 1 f., 13 f.

[104] Eph. 1:1-14

[105] Ed. Funk

[106] Ed. Duchesne, I, 129

[107] Nos. 24, 26.

[108] Ad Eph., IX, 1; ad Magnesios, XIII, 1.

[109] Contra Noetum, 8

[110] Tertullian, Adversus Praxeam, chaps. 2, 13

[111] Origen, In Joannem, II, 6; XXXII, 18, PG, XIV, 132, 821.

[112] St. Thomas, In Prologum Ev. sec. Joannem, on the first verse

[113] Origen, Selecta in psalmos, hom. XIII, 134; In Matt., XIV, 7; In Epistolam ad Hebraeos, PG, XIV, 1308, quoted by Tanquerey, Synopsis major, p. 383.

[114] Denz-, nos. 48-51

[115] ibid., no. 54

[116] St. Athanasius, Adversus Arianos rationes; cf. Rouet de Journel, Ench. patrist., nos. 675 f., 753, 760 f.

[117] St. Athanasius, Contra Arianos, I, 16, 39; II, 69; I Epist. ad Serapion, 17 (Tixeront, Hist. dogm., II, 67-96).

[118] Marin Sola, Evolution homogene du dogme catholique, I, no. 202

[119] St. Robert Bellarmine, De Verbo Dei, III, 10.

[120] I, Ep. ad Serapionem, 17. Denz., nos. 74, 86

[121] cf. de Regnon, S.J., Etudes de theologie positive sur la Sainte Trinite (1892-98) Part I, 251, II; P. Jugie, Theologia dogmatica Christianorum orientalium, III, 221 f.; A. d'Ales, De Trinitate; Penido, Role de l'analogie en theol. dogm. (1931), p. 295, Galtier, De Trinitate, p. 164, n. 1

[122] St. Athanasius, Adversus Arianos, III, 35 ff.

[123] ibid., 35 f.; St. John Damascene, De fide orthodoxa, I, 8.

[124] Summa, Ia, q. 39, a. 8

[125] De Trinitate. Bks. IX, X.

[126] Summa, Ia, q. 27, a. 2.

[127] ibid., a. 4.

[128] Denz., nos. 77 ff., 254, 281, 284, 421, 428.

[129] ibid., no. 703; cf. St. Augustine, De Trinitate, XV, chap. 4, n. 5

[130] Summa, Ia, q. 34, a. 1 ad 3

[131] cf. below, question 37, article 2.

[132] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 235-332, 308 f., 313

[133] Summa Ia, q. 5, a. 2

[134] Richard, De Trinitate, III, PL, CXCVI, 916 f.

[135] St. Gregory the Great, Hom. 17.

[136] Richard, loc. cit.

[137] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 2; De veritate, q. 10, a. 4; De potentia, q. 8, a. 3

[138] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 287

[139] ibid., II, 326

[140] Alexander of Hales, Summa theologica, Ia, q. 42, m. 1; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 373 f.

[141] Alexander of Hales, op. cit., Ia, q. 42, m. 2

[142] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 382

[143] Peter Bles, PL, CCVII, 933

[144] William of Auxerre, Summa, I, chap. 2

[145] St. Bonaventure, I Sent., dist. 10, a. 1, q. I; cf. Rousselot, Pour l'histoire du probleme de l'amour au Moyen-Age, p. 65.

[146] Summa, Ia, q. 32, a. 1 ad 2; De veritate, q. 10, a. 4; De pot., q. 8, a. 3

[147] St. Bonaventure, op. cit., Ia, dist. 9, a. 1, q. I; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 457

[148] De Regnon, op. cit., II, 461, 467 f., 493, 506

[149] St. Bonaventure, op. cit., Ia, dist. 9, a. 1, q. I; De Regnon, op. cit., II, 507

[150] Summa, Ia, q. 5, a. 4 ad 2; Ia IIae, q. 1, a. 4 ad 1.

[151] ibid., IIIa, q. 1, a. 1

[152] ibid., Ia, q. 19, a. 2.

[153] ibid., IIIa, q. 73, a. 5 ad 3.

[154] ibid., Ia, q. 27, a. 5 ad 2; Ia, q. 27, a. 1 ad 2.

[155] cf. especially q. 27, a. 1. ad 2.