|
EDISON had no sooner designed his dynamo in
1879 than he adopted the same form of machine
for use as a motor. The two are shown in the
Scientific American of October 18,
1879, and are alike, except that the dynamo
is vertical and the motor lies in a horizontal
position, the article remarking: "Its
construction differs but slightly from the
electric generator." This was but an evidence
of his early appreciation of the importance of
electricity as a motive power; but it will
probably surprise many people to know that he was
the inventor of an electric motor before he
perfected his incandescent lamp. His interest
in the subject went back to his connection with
General Lefferts in the days of the evolution
of the stock ticker. While Edison was carrying
on his shop at Newark, New Jersey, there was
considerable excitement in electrical circles
over the Payne motor, in regard to the alleged
performance of which Governor Cornell of New
York and other wealthy capitalists were quite
enthusiastic. Payne had a shop in Newark, and
in one small room was the motor, weighing
perhaps six hundred pounds. It was of circular
form, incased in iron, with the ends of several
small magnets sticking through the floor. A
pulley and belt, con- nected to a circular saw
larger than the motor, permitted large logs of
oak timber to be sawed with ease with the use of
two small cells of battery. Edison's friend,
General Lefferts, had become excited and was
determined to invest a large sum of money in the
motor company, but knowing Edison's intimate
familiarity with all electrical subjects he was
wise enough to ask his young expert to go and see
the motor with him. At an appointed hour
Edison went to the office of the motor company
and found there the venerable Professor Morse,
Governor Cornell, General Lefferts, and
many others who had been invited to witness a
performance of the motor. They all proceeded to
the room where the motor was at work. Payne put
a wire in the binding-post of the battery, the
motor started, and an assistant began sawing a
heavy oak log. It worked beautifully, and so
great was the power developed, apparently, from
the small battery, that Morse exclaimed: "I
am thankful that I have lived to see this
day." But Edison kept a close watch on the
motor. The results were so foreign to his
experience that he knew there was a trick in it.
He soon discovered it. While holding his hand
on the frame of the motor he noticed a tremble
coincident with the exhaust of an engine across
the alleyway, and he then knew that the power
came from the engine by a belt under the floor,
shifted on and off by a magnet, the other
magnets being a blind. He whispered to the
General to put his hand on the frame of the
motor, watch the exhaust, and note the
coincident tremor. The General did so, and in
about fifteen seconds he said: "Well,
Edison, I must go now. This thing is a
fraud." And thus he saved his money, although
others not so shrewdly advised were easily
persuaded to invest by such a demonstration.
A few years later, in 1878, Edison went
to Wyoming with a group of astronomers, to test
his tasimeter during an eclipse of the sun, and
saw the land white to harvest. He noticed the
long hauls to market or elevator that the farmers
had to make with their loads of grain at great
expense, and conceived the idea that as ordinary
steam-railroad service was too costly, light
electric railways might be constructed that could
be operated automatically over simple tracks,
the propelling motors being controlled at various
points. Cheap to build and cheap to maintain,
such roads would be a great boon to the newer
farming regions of the West, where the highways
were still of the crudest character, and where
transportation was the gravest difficulty with
which the settlers had to contend. The plan
seems to have haunted him, and he had no sooner
worked out a generator and motor that owing to
their low internal resistance could be operated
efficiently, than he turned his hand to the
practical trial of such a railroad, applicable
to both the haulage of freight and the
transportation of passengers. Early in
1880, when the tremendous rush of work
involved in the invention of the incandescent
lamp intermitted a little, he began the
construction of a stretch of track close to the
Menlo Park laboratory, and at the same time
built an electric locomotive to operate over it.
This is a fitting stage at which to review
briefly what had been done in electric traction
up to that date. There was absolutely no art,
but there had been a number of sporadic and very
interesting experiments made. The honor of the
first attempt of any kind appears to rest with
this country and with Thomas Davenport, a
self-trained blacksmith, of Brandon,
Vermont, who made a small model of a circular
electric railway and cars in 1834, and
exhibited it the following year in Springfield,
Boston, and other cities. Of course he
depended upon batteries for current, but the
fundamental idea was embodied of using the track
for the circuit, one rail being positive and the
other negative, and the motor being placed
across or between them in multiple arc to receive
the current. Such are also practically the
methods of to-day. The little model was in
good preservation up to the year 1900,
when, being shipped to the Paris Exposition,
it was lost, the steamer that carried it
foundering in mid-ocean. The very broad patent
taken out by this simple mechanic, so far ahead
of his times, was the first one issued in
America for an electric motor. Davenport was
also the first man to apply electric power to the
printing-press, in 1840. In his traction
work he had a close second in Robert Davidson,
of Aberdeen, Scotland, who in 1839
operated both a lathe and a small locomotive with
the motor he had invented. His was the credit
of first actually carrying passengers--two at a
time, over a rough plank road--while it is
said that his was the first motor to be tried on
real tracks, those of the Edinburgh-Glasgow
road, making a speed of four miles an hour.
The curse of this work and of all that succeeded
it for a score of years was the necessity of
depending upon chemical batteries for current,
the machine usually being self-contained and
hauling the batteries along with itself, as in
the case of the famous Page experiments in
April, 1851, when a speed of nineteen
miles an hour was attained on the line of the
Washington & Baltimore road. To this
unfruitful period belonged, however, the crude
idea of taking the current from a stationary
source of power by means of an overhead contact,
which has found its practical evolution in the
modern ubiquitous trolley; although the patent
for this, based on his caveat of 1879, was
granted several years later than that to Stephen
D. Field, for the combination of an electric
motor operated by means of a current from a
stationary dynamo or source of electricity
conducted through the rails. As a matter of
fact, in 1856 and again in 1875,
George F. Green, a jobbing machinist, of
Kalamazoo, Michigan, built small cars and
tracks to which current was fed from a distant
battery, enough energy being utilized to haul
one hundred pounds of freight or one passenger up
and down a "road" two hundred feet long. All
the work prior to the development of the dynamo
as a source of current was sporadic and
spasmodic, and cannot be said to have left any
trace on the art, though it offered many
suggestions as to operative methods.
The close of the same decade of the nineteenth
century that saw the electric light brought to
perfection, saw also the realization in practice
of all the hopes of fifty years as to electric
traction. Both utilizations depended upon the
supply of current now cheaply obtainable from the
dynamo. These arts were indeed twins, feeding
at inexhaustible breasts. In 1879, at the
Berlin Exhibition, the distinguished firm of
Siemens, to whose ingenuity and enterprise
electrical development owes so much, installed a
road about one-third of a mile in length, over
which the locomotive hauled a train of three
small cars at a speed of about eight miles an
hour, carrying some twenty persons every trip.
Current was fed from a dynamo to the motor
through a central third rail, the two outer
rails being joined together as the negative or
return circuit. Primitive but essentially
successful, this little road made a profound
impression on the minds of many inventors and
engineers, and marked the real beginning of the
great new era, which has already seen
electricity applied to the operation of main
lines of trunk railways. But it is not to be
supposed that on the part of the public there was
any great amount of faith then discernible; and
for some years the pioneers had great
difficulty, especially in this country, in
raising money for their early modest
experiments. Of the general conditions at this
moment Frank J. Sprague says in an article in
the Century Magazine of July, 1905, on
the creation of the new art: "Edison was
perhaps nearer the verge of great
electric-railway possibilities than any other
American. In the face of much adverse
criticism he had developed the essentials of the
low-internal- resistance dynamo with
high-resistance field, and many of the
essential features of multiple-arc
distribution, and in 1880 he built a small
road at his laboratory at Menlo Park."
On May 13th of the year named this
interesting road went into operation as the
result of hard and hurried work of preparation
during the spring months. The first track was
about a third of a mile in length, starting from
the shops, following a country road, passing
around a hill at the rear and curving home, in
the general form of the letter "U." The
rails were very light. Charles T. Hughes,
who went with Edison in 1879, and was in
charge of much of the work, states that they
were "second" street-car rails, insulated
with tar canvas paper and things of that sort--
"asphalt." They were spiked down on ordinary
sleepers laid upon the natural grade, and the
gauge was about three feet six inches. At one
point the grade dropped some sixty feet in a
distance of three hundred, and the curves were
of recklessly short radius. The dynamos
supplying current to the road were originally two
of the standard size "Z" machines then being
made at the laboratory, popularly known
throughout the Edison ranks as "Longwaisted
Mary Anns," and the circuits from these were
carried out to the rails by underground
conductors. They were not large--about twelve
horse-power each--generating seventy-five
amperes of current at one hundred and ten volts,
so that not quite twenty-five horse-power of
electrical energy was available for propulsion.
The locomotive built while the roadbed was
getting ready was a four-wheeled iron truck, an
ordinary flat dump-car about six feet long and
four feet wide, upon which was mounted a "Z"
dynamo used as a motor, so that it had a
capacity of about twelve horsepower. This
machine was laid on its side, with the armature
end coming out at the front of the locomotive,
and the motive power was applied to the
driving-axle by a cumbersome series of friction
pulleys. Each wheel of the locomotive had a
metal rim and a centre web of wood or
papier-mache, and the current picked up by one
set of wheels was carried through contact brushes
and a brass hub to the motor; the circuit back
to the track, or other rail, being closed
through the other wheels in a similar manner.
The motor had its field-magnet circuit in
permanent connection as a shunt across the
rails, protected by a crude bare copper-wire
safety-catch. A switch in the armature circuit
enabled the motorman to reverse the direction of
travel by reversing the current flow through the
armature coils.
Things went fairly well for a time on that
memorable Thursday afternoon, when all the
laboratory force made high holiday and scrambled
for foothold on the locomotive for a trip; but
the friction gearing was not equal to the sudden
strain put upon it during one run and went to
pieces. Some years later, also, Daft again
tried friction gear in his historical experiments
on the Manhattan Elevated road, but the
results were attended with no greater success.
The next resort of Edison was to belts, the
armature shafting belted to a countershaft on the
locomotive frame, and the countershaft belted to
a pulley on the car- axle. The lever which
threw the former friction gear into adjustment
was made to operate an idler pulley for
tightening the axle-belt. When the motor was
started, the armature was brought up to full
revolution and then the belt was tightened on the
car- axle, compelling motion of the
locomotive. But the belts were liable to slip a
great deal in the process, and the chafing of
the belts charred them badly. If that did not
happen, and if the belt was made taut suddenly,
the armature burned out--which it did with
disconcerting frequency. The next step was to
use a number of resistance-boxes in series with
the armature, so that the locomotive could start
with those in circuit, and then the motorman
could bring it up to speed gradually by cutting
one box out after the other. To stop the
locomotive, the armature circuit was opened by
the main switch, stopping the flow of current,
and then brakes were applied by long levers.
Matters generally and the motors in particular
went much better, even if the locomotive was so
freely festooned with resistance-boxes all of
perceptible weight and occupying much of the
limited space. These details show forcibly and
typically the painful steps of advance that every
inventor in this new field had to make in the
effort to reach not alone commercial
practicability, but mechanical feasibility. It
was all empirical enough; but that was the only
way open even to the highest talent.
Smugglers landing laces and silks have been
known to wind them around their bodies, as being
less ostentatious than carrying them in a trunk.
Edison thought his resistance-boxes an equally
superfluous display, and therefore ingeniously
wound some copper resistance wire around one of
the legs of the motor field magnet, where it was
out of the way, served as a useful extra field
coil in starting up the motor, and dismissed
most of the boxes back to the laboratory;
a few being retained under the seat for chance
emergencies. Like the boxes, this coil was in
series with the armature, and subject to
plugging in and out at will by the motorman.
Thus equipped, the locomotive was found quite
satisfactory, and long did yeoman service. It
was given three cars to pull, one an open
awning-car with two park benches placed back to
back; one a flat freight-car, and one box-car
dubbed the "Pullman," with which Edison
illustrated a system of electric braking.
Although work had been begun so early in the
year, and the road had been operating since
May, it was not until July that Edison
executed any application for patents on his
"electromagnetic railway engine," or his
ingenious braking system. Every inventor knows
how largely his fate lies in the hands of a
competent and alert patent attorney, in both the
preparation and the prosecution of his case; and
Mr. Sprague is justified in observing in his
Century article: ""The paucity of
controlling claims obtained in these early
patents is remarkable." It is notorious that
Edison did not then enjoy the skilful aid in
safeguarding his ideas that he commanded later.
The daily newspapers and technical journals lost
no time in bringing the road to public
attention, and the New York Herald of June
25th was swift to suggest that here was the
locomotive that would be "most pleasing to the
average New Yorker, whose head has ached with
noise, whose eyes have been filled with dust,
or whose clothes have been ruined with oil." A
couple of days later, the Daily Graphic
illustrated and described the road and published
a sketch of a one-hundred-horse-power electric
locomotive for the use of the Pennsylvania
Railroad between Perth Amboy and Rahway.
Visitors, of course, were numerous, including
many curious, sceptical railroad managers, few
if any of whom except Villard could see the
slightest use for the new motive power. There
is, perhaps, some excuse for such
indifference. No men in the world have more new
inventions brought to them than railroad
managers, and this was the rankest kind of
novelty. It was not, indeed, until a year
later, in May, 1881, that the first
regular road collecting fares was put in
operation--a little stretch of one and a half
miles from Berlin to Lichterfelde, with one
miniature motorcar. Edison was in reality doing
some heavy electric- railway engineering, his
apparatus full of ideas, suggestions,
prophecies; but to the operators of long trunk
lines it must have seemed utterly insignificant
and "excellent fooling."
Speaking of this situation, Mr. Edison
says: "One day Frank Thomson, the
President of the Pennsylvania Railroad, came
out to see the electric light and the electric
railway in operation. The latter was then about
a mile long. He rode on it. At that time I
was getting out plans to make an electric
locomotive of three hundred horse-power with
six-foot drivers, with the idea of showing
people that they could dispense with their steam
locomotives. Mr. Thomson made the objection
that it was impracticable, and that it would be
impossible to supplant steam. His great
experience and standing threw a wet blanket on my
hopes. But I thought he might perhaps be
mistaken, as there had been many such instances
on record. I continued to work on the plans,
and about three years later I started to build
the locomotive at the works at Goerck Street,
and had it about finished when I was switched
off on some other work. One of the reasons why
I felt the electric railway to be eminently
practical was that Henry Villard, the
President of the Northern Pacific, said that
one of the greatest things that could be done
would be to build right-angle feeders into the
wheat-fields of Dakota and bring in the wheat
to the main lines, as the farmers then had to
draw it from forty to eighty miles. There was a
point where it would not pay to raise it at all;
and large areas of the country were thus of no
value. I conceived the idea of building a very
light railroad of narrow gauge, and had got all
the data as to the winds on the plains, and
found that it would be possible with very large
windmills to supply enough power to drive those
wheat trains."
Among others who visited the little road at this
juncture were persons interested in the
Manhattan Elevated system of New York, on
which experiments were repeatedly tried later,
but which was not destined to adopt a method so
obviously well suited to all the conditions until
after many successful demonstrations had been
made on elevated roads elsewhere. It must be
admitted that Mr. Edison was not very
profoundly impressed with the desire entertained
in that quarter to utilize any improvement, for
he remarks: "When the Elevated Railroad in
New York, up Sixth Avenue, was started
there was a great clamor about the noise, and
injunctions were threatened. The management
engaged me to make a report on the cause of the
noise. I constructed an instrument that would
record the sound, and set out to make a
preliminary report, but I found that they never
intended to do anything but let the people
complain."
It was upon the co-operation of Villard that
Edison fell back, and an agreement was entered
into between them on September 14, 1881,
which provided that the latter would "build two
and a half miles of electric railway at Menlo
Park, equipped with three cars, two
locomotives, one for freight, and one for
passengers, capacity of latter sixty miles an
hour. Capacity freight engine, ten tons net
freight; cost of handling a ton of freight per
mile per horse-power to be less than ordinary
locomotive.... If experiments are
successful, Villard to pay actual outlay in
experiments, and to treat with the Light
Company for the installation of at least fifty
miles of electric railroad in the wheat
regions." Mr. Edison is authority for the
statement that Mr. Villard advanced between
$35,000 and $40,000, and that the
work done was very satisfactory; but it did not
end at that time in any practical results, as
the Northern Pacific went into the hands of a
receiver, and Mr. Villard's ability to help
was hopelessly crippled. The directors of the
Edison Electric Light Company could not be
induced to have anything to do with the electric
railway, and Mr. Insull states that the money
advanced was treated by Mr. Edison as a
personal loan and repaid to Mr. Villard, for
whom he had a high admiration and a strong
feeling of attachment. Mr. Insull says:
"Among the financial men whose close personal
friendship Edison enjoyed, I would mention
Henry Villard, who, I think, had a higher
appreciation of the possibilities of the Edison
system than probably any other man of his time in
Wall Street. He dropped out of the business
at the time of the consolidation of the
Thomson-Houston Company with the Edison
General Electric Company; but from the
earliest days of the business, when it was in
its experimental period, when the Edison light
and power system was but an idea, down to the
day of his death, Henry Villard continued a
strong supporter not only with his influence,
but with his money. He was the first capitalist
to back individually Edison's experiments in
electric railways."
In speaking of his relationships with Mr.
Villard at this time, Edison says: "When
Villard was all broken down, and in a stupor
caused by his disasters in connection with the
Northern Pacific, Mrs. Villard sent for me
to come and cheer him up. It was very difficult
to rouse him from his despair and apathy, but I
talked about the electric light to him, and its
development, and told him that it would help him
win it all back and put him in his former
position. Villard made his great rally; he
made money out of the electric light; and he got
back control of the Northern Pacific. Under
no circumstances can a hustler be kept down. If
he is only square, he is bound to get back on
his feet. Villard has often been blamed and
severely criticised, but he was not the only one
to blame. His engineers had spent
$20,000,000 too much in building the
road, and it was not his fault if he found
himself short of money, and at that time unable
to raise any more."
Villard maintained his intelligent interest in
electric- railway development, with regard to
which Edison remarks: "At one time Mr.
Villard got the idea that he would run the
mountain division of the Northern Pacific
Railroad by electricity. He asked me if it
could be done. I said: `Certainly, it is
too easy for me to undertake; let some one else
do it.' He said: `I want you to tackle the
problem,' and he insisted on it. So I got up
a scheme of a third rail and shoe and erected it
in my yard here in Orange. When I got it all
ready, he had all his division engineers come on
to New York, and they came over here. I
showed them my plans, and the unanimous decision
of the engineers was that it was absolutely and
utterly impracticable. That system is on the
New York Central now, and was also used on
the New Haven road in its first work with
electricity."
At this point it may be well to cite some other
statements of Edison as to kindred work, with
which he has not usually been associated in the
public mind. "In the same manner I had worked
out for the Manhattan Elevated Railroad a
system of electric trains, and had the control
of each car centred at one place --multiple
control. This was afterward worked out and made
practical by Frank Sprague. I got up a slot
contact for street railways, and have a patent
on it--a sliding contact in a slot. Edward
Lauterbach was connected with the Third Avenue
Railroad in New York--as counsel--and I
told him he was mak- ing a horrible mistake
putting in the cable. I told him to let the
cable stand still and send electricity through
it, and he would not have to move hundreds of
tons of metal all the time. He would rue the
day when he put the cable in." It cannot be
denied that the prophecy was fulfilled, for the
cable was the beginning of the frightful
financial collapse of the system, and was torn
out in a few years to make way for the triumphant
"trolley in the slot."
Incidental glimpses of this work are both
amusing and interesting. Hughes, who was
working on the experimental road with Mr.
Edison, tells the following story: "Villard
sent J. C. Henderson, one of his mechanical
engineers, to see the road when it was in
operation, and we went down one day--Edison,
Henderson, and I--and went on the
locomotive. Edison ran it, and just after we
started there was a trestle sixty feet long and
seven feet deep, and Edison put on all the
power. When we went over it we must have been
going forty miles an hour, and I could see the
perspiration come out on Henderson. After we
got over the trestle and started on down the
track, Henderson said: `When we go back I
will walk. If there is any more of that kind of
running I won't be in it myself.' " To the
correspondence of Grosvenor P. Lowrey we are
indebted for a similar reminiscence, under date
of June 5, 1880: "Goddard and I have
spent a part of the day at Menlo, and all is
glorious. I have ridden at forty miles an hour
on Mr. Edison's electric railway--and we
ran off the track. I protested at the rate of
speed over the sharp curves, designed to show
the power of the engine, but Edison said they
had done it often. Finally, when the last trip
was to be taken, I said I did not like it,
but would go along. The train jumped the track
on a short curve, throwing Kruesi, who was
driving the engine, with his face down in the
dirt, and another man in a comical somersault
through some underbrush. Edison was off in a
minute, jumping and laughing, and declaring it
a most beautiful accident. Kruesi got up, his
face bleeding and a good deal shaken; and I
shall never forget the expression of voice and
face in which he said, with some foreign
accent: `Oh! yes, pairfeckly safe.'
Fortunately no other hurts were suffered, and
in a few minutes we had the train on the track
and running again."
All this rough-and-ready dealing with grades
and curves was not mere horse-play, but had a
serious purpose underlying it, every trip having
its record as to some feature of defect or
improvement. One particular set of experiments
relating to such work was made on behalf of
visitors from South America, and were
doubtless the first tests of the kind made for
that continent, where now many fine electric
street and interurban railway systems are in
operation. Mr. Edison himself supplies the
following data: "During the electric-railway
experiments at Menlo Park, we had a short spur
of track up one of the steep gullies. The
experiment came about in this way. Bogota, the
capital of Columbia, is reached on
muleback--or was--from Honda on the
headwaters of the Magdalena River. There were
parties who wanted to know if transportation over
the mule route could not be done by electricity.
They said the grades were excessive, and it
would cost too much to do it with steam
locomotives, even if they could climb the
grades. I said: `Well, it can't be much
more than 45 per cent.; we will try that
first. If it will do that it will do anything
else.' I started at 45 per cent. I got up
an electric locomotive with a grip on the rail by
which it went up the 45 per cent. grade.
Then they said the curves were very short. I
put the curves in. We started the locomotive
with nobody on it, and got up to twenty miles an
hour, taking those curves of very short radius;
but it was weeks before we could prevent it from
running off. We had to bank the tracks up to an
angle of thirty degrees before we could turn the
curve and stay on. These Spanish parties were
perfectly satisfied we could put in an electric
railway from Honda to Bogota successfully, and
then they disappeared. I have never seen them
since. As usual, I paid for the
experiment."
In the spring of 1883 the Electric Railway
Company of America was incorporated in the
State of New York with a capital of
$2,000,000 to develop the patents and
inventions of Edison and Stephen D. Field,
to the latter of whom the practical work of
active development was confided, and in June of
the same year an exhibit was made at the Chicago
Railway Exposition, which attracted attention
throughout the country, and did much to
stimulate the growing interest in
electric-railway work. With the aid of
Messrs. F. B. Rae, C. L. Healy, and
C. O. Mailloux a track and locomotive were
constructed for the company by Mr. Field and
put in service in the gallery of the main
exhibition building. The track curved sharply
at either end on a radius of fifty-six feet,
and the length was about one-third of a mile.
The locomotive named "The Judge," after
Justice Field, an uncle of Stephen D.
Field, took current from a central rail between
the two outer rails, that were the return
circuit, the contact being a rubbing wire brush
on each side of the "third rail," answering
the same purpose as the contact shoe of later
date. The locomotive weighed three tons, was
twelve feet long, five feet wide, and made a
speed of nine miles an hour with a trailer car
for passengers. Starting on June 5th, when
the exhibition closed on June 23d this tiny
but typical road had operated for over 118
hours, had made over 446 miles, and had
carried 26,805 passengers. After the
exposition closed the outfit was taken during the
same year to the exposition at Louisville,
Kentucky, where it was also successful,
carrying a large number of passengers. It
deserves note that at Chicago regular railway
tickets were issued to paying passengers, the
first ever employed on American electric
railways.
With this modest but brilliant demonstration,
to which the illustrious names of Edison and
Field were attached, began the outburst of
excitement over electric railways, very much
like the eras of speculation and exploitation
that attended only a few years earlier the
introduction of the telephone and the electric
light, but with such significant results that
the capitalization of electric roads in America
is now over $4,000,000,000, or
twice as much as that of the other two arts
combined. There was a tremendous rush into the
electric-railway field after 1883, and an
outburst of inventive activity that has rarely,
if ever, been equalled. It is remarkable
that, except Siemens, no European achieved
fame in this early work, while from America the
ideas and appliances of Edison, Van Depoele,
Sprague, Field, Daft, and Short have been
carried and adopted all over the world.
Mr. Edison was consulting electrician for the
Electric Railway Company, but neither a
director nor an executive officer. Just what
the trouble was as to the internal management of
the corporation it is hard to determine a quarter
of a century later; but it was equipped with all
essential elements to dominate an art in which
after its first efforts it remained practically
supine and useless, while other interests forged
ahead and reaped both the profit and the glory.
Dissensions arose between the representatives of
the Field and Edison interests, and in
April, 1890, the Railway Company
assigned its rights to the Edison patents to the
Edison General Electric Company, recently
formed by the consolidation of all the branches
of the Edison light, power, and manufacturing
industry under one management. The only patent
rights remaining to the Railway Company were
those under three Field patents, one of which,
with controlling claims, was put in suit June,
1890, against the Jamaica & Brooklyn
Road Company, a customer of the Edison
General Electric Company. This was, to say
the least, a curious and anomalous situation.
Voluminous records were made by both parties to
the suit, and in the spring of 1894 the case
was argued before the late Judge Townsend, who
wrote a long opinion dismissing the bill of
complaint.[15] The student will find
therein a very complete and careful study of the
early electric-railway art. After this
decision was rendered, the Electric Railway
Company remained for several years in a moribund
condition, and on the last day of 1896 its
property was placed in the hands of a receiver.
In February of 1897 the receiver sold the
three Field patents to their original owner,
and he in turn sold them to the Westinghouse
Electric and Manufacturing Company. The
Railway Company then went into voluntary
dissolution, a sad example of failure to seize
the opportunity at the psychological moment, and
on the part of the inventor to secure any
adequate return for years of effort and struggle
in founding one of the great arts. Neither of
these men was squelched by such a calamitous
result, but if there were not something of
bitterness in their feelings as they survey what
has come of their work, they would not be
human.
As a matter of fact, Edison retained a very
lively interest in electric-railway progress
long after the pregnant days at Menlo Park,
one of the best evidences of which is an article
in the New York Electrical Engineer of
November 18, 1891, which describes some
important and original experiments in the
direction of adapting electrical conditions to
the larger cities. The overhead trolley had by
that time begun its victorious career, but there
was intense hostility displayed toward it in many
places because of the inevitable increase in the
number of overhead wires, which, carrying, as
they did, a current of high voltage and large
quantity, were regarded as a menace to life and
property. Edison has always manifested a strong
objection to overhead wires in cities, and urged
placing them underground; and the outcry against
the overhead "deadly" trolley met with his
instant sympathy. His study of the problem
brought him to the development of the modern
"substation," although the twists that later
evolutions have given the idea have left it
scarcely recognizable.
Mr. Villard, as President of the Edison
General Electric Company, requested Mr.
Edison, as electrician of the company, to
devise a street-railway system which should be
applicable to the largest cities where the use of
the trolley would not be permitted, where the
slot conduit system would not be used, and
where, in general, the details of construction
should be reduced to the simplest form. The
limits imposed practically were such as to
require that the system should not cost more than
a cable road to install. Edison reverted to his
ingenious lighting plan of years earlier, and
thus settled on a method by which current should
be conveyed from the power plant at high
potential to motor-generators placed below the
ground in close proximity to the rails. These
substations would convert the current received at
a pressure of, say, one thousand volts to one
of twenty volts available between rail and rail,
with a corresponding increase in the volume of
the current. With the utilization of heavy
currents at low voltage it became necessary, of
course, to devise apparatus which should be able
to pick up with absolute certainty one thousand
amperes of current at this press- ure through
two inches of mud, if necessary. With his
wonted activity and fertility Edison set about
devising such a contact, and experimented with
metal wheels under all conditions of speed and
track conditions. It was several months before
he could convey one hundred amperes by means of
such contacts, but he worked out at last a
satisfactory device which was equal to the task.
The next point was to secure a joint between
contiguous rails such as would permit of the
passage of several thousand amperes without
introducing undue resistance. This was also
accomplished.
Objections were naturally made to rails out in
the open on the street surface carrying large
currents at a potential of twenty volts. It was
said that vehicles with iron wheels passing over
the tracks and spanning the two rails would
short-circuit the current, "chew" themselves
up, and destroy the dynamos generating the
current by choking all that tremendous amount of
energy back into them. Edison tackled the
objection squarely and short-circuited his track
with such a vehicle, but succeeded in getting
only about two hundred amperes through the
wheels, the low voltage and the insulating
properties of the axle- grease being sufficient
to account for such a result. An iron bar was
also used, polished, and with a man standing on
it to insure solid contact; but only one
thousand amperes passed through it--i.e.,
the amount required by a single car, and, of
course, much less than the capacity of the
generators able to operate a system of several
hundred cars.
Further interesting experiments showed that the
expected large leakage of current from the rails
in wet weather did not materialize. Edison
found that under the worst conditions with a wet
and salted
track, at a potential difference of twenty volts
between the two rails, the extreme loss was only
two and one-half horse-power. In this respect
the phenomenon followed the same rule as that to
which telegraph wires are subject--namely,
that the loss of insulation is greater in damp,
murky weather when the insulators are covered
with wet dust than during heavy rains when the
insulators are thoroughly washed by the action of
the water. In like manner a heavy rain-storm
cleaned the tracks from the accumulations due
chiefly to the droppings of the horses, which
otherwise served largely to increase the
conductivity. Of course, in dry weather the
loss of current was practically nothing, and,
under ordinary conditions, Edison held, his
system was in respect to leakage and the problems
of electrolytic attack of the current on adjacent
pipes, etc., as fully insulated as the
standard trolley network of the day. The cost
of his system Mr. Edison placed at from
$30,000 to $100,000 per mile of
double track, in accordance with local
conditions, and in this respect comparing very
favorably with the cable systems then so much in
favor for heavy traffic. All the arguments that
could be urged in support of this ingenious
system are tenable and logical at the present
moment; but the trolley had its way except on a
few lines where the conduit-and-shoe method was
adopted; and in the intervening years the volume
of traffic created and handled by electricity in
centres of dense population has brought into
existence the modern subway.
But down to the moment of the preparation of
this biography, Edison has retained an active
interest in transportation problems, and his
latest work has been that of reviving the use of
the storage battery for street-car purposes.
At one time there were a number of
storage-battery lines and cars in operation in
such cities as Washington, New York,
Chicago, and Boston; but the costs of
operation and maintenance were found to be
inordinately high as compared with those of the
direct-supply methods, and the battery cars all
disappeared. The need for them under many
conditions remained, as, for example, in
places in Greater New York where the overhead
trolley wires are forbidden as objectionable,
and where the ground is too wet or too often
submerged to permit of the conduit with the
slot. Some of the roads in Greater New York
have been anxious to secure such cars, and, as
usual, the most resourceful electrical engineer
and inventor of his times has made the effort.
A special experimental track has been laid at
the Orange laboratory, and a car equipped with
the Edison storage battery and other devices has
been put under severe and extended trial there
and in New York.
Menlo Park, in ruin and decay, affords no
traces of the early Edison electric-railway
work, but the crude little locomotive built by
Charles T. Hughes was rescued from
destruction, and has become the property of the
Pratt Institute, of Brooklyn, towhose
thousands of technical students it is a constant
example and incentive. It was loaned in
1904 to the Association of Edison
Illuminating Companies, and by it exhibited as
part of the historical Edison collection at the
St. Louis Exposition.
|
|