|
Now, in general anything that has a potentiality is actually
something else, and this potentiality of the future mode of being
is an existing mode.
But what we think of as Matter, what we assert to be the
potentiality of all things, cannot be said to be actually any one
being among beings: if it were of itself any definite being, it
could not be potentially all.
If, then, it is not among existences, it must necessarily be
without existence.
How, therefore, can it be actually anything?
The answer is that while Matter can not be any of the things
which are founded upon it, it may quite well be something else,
admitting that all existences are not rooted in Matter.
But once more, if it is excluded from the entities founded upon
it and all these are Beings, it must itself be a Non-Being.
It is, further, by definition, formless and therefore not an
Idea: it cannot then be classed among things of the Intellectual
Realm, and so is, once more, a Non-Being. Falling, as regards
both worlds, under Non-Being, it is all the more decidedly the
Non-Being.
It has eluded the Nature of the Authentic Existences; it has even
failed to come up with the things to which a spurious existence
can be attributed- for it is not even a phantasm of Reason as
these are- how is it possible to include it under any mode of
Being?
And if it falls under no mode of Being, what can it actually be?
5. How can we talk of it? How can it be the Matter of real
things?
It is talked of, and it serves, precisely, as a Potentiality.
And, as being a Potentiality, it is not of the order of the thing
it is to become: its existence is no more than an announcement of
a future, as it were a thrust forward to what is to come into
existence.
As Potentiality then, it is not any definite thing but the
potentiality of everything: being nothing in itself- beyond what
being Matter amounts to- it is not in actualization. For if it
were actually something, that actualized something would not be
Matter, or at least not Matter out and out, but merely Matter in
the limited sense in which bronze is the matter of the statue.
And its Non-Being must be no mere difference from Being.
Motion, for example, is different from Being, but plays about it,
springing from it and living within it: Matter is, so to speak,
the outcast of Being, it is utterly removed, irredeemably what it
was from the beginning: in origin it was Non-Being and so it
remains.
Nor are we to imagine that, standing away at the very beginning
from the universal circle of Beings, it was thus necessarily an
active Something or that it became a Something. It has never been
able to annex for itself even a visible outline from all the
forms under which it has sought to creep: it has always pursued
something other than itself; it was never more than a
Potentiality towards its next: where all the circle of Being
ends, there only is it manifest; discerned underneath things
produced after it, it is remoter [from Real-Being] even than
they.
Grasped, then, as an underlie in each order of Being, it can be
no actualization of either: all that is allowed to it is to be a
Potentiality, a weak and blurred phantasm, a thing incapable of a
Shape of its own.
Its actuality is that of being a phantasm, the actuality of being
a falsity; and the false in actualization is the veritably false,
which again is Authentic Non-Existence.
So that Matter, as the Actualization of Non-Being, is all the
more decidedly Non-Being, is Authentic Non-Existence.
Thus, since the very reality of its Nature is situated in
Non-Being, it is in no degree the Actualization of any definite
Being.
If it is to be present at all, it cannot be an Actualization, for
then it would not be the stray from Authentic Being which it is,
the thing having its Being in Non-Beingness: for, note, in the
case of things whose Being is a falsity, to take away the falsity
is to take away what Being they have, and if we introduce
actualization into things whose Being and Essence is
Potentiality, we destroy the foundation of their nature since
their Being is Potentiality.
If Matter is to be kept as the unchanging substratum, we must
keep it as Matter: that means- does it not?- that we must define
it as a Potentiality and nothing more- or refute these
considerations.
|
|