|
But, if all this be true, how can evil fall within the scope
of seership? The predictions of the seers are based on
observation of the Universal Circuit: how can this indicate the
evil with the good?
Clearly the reason is that all contraries coalesce. Take, for
example, Shape and Matter: the living being [of the lower order]
is a coalescence of these two; so that to be aware of the Shape
and the Reason-Principle is to be aware of the Matter on which
the Shape has been imposed.
The living-being of the compound order is not present [as pure
and simple Idea] like the living being of the Intellectual order:
in the compound entity, we are aware, at once, of the
Reason-Principle and of the inferior element brought under form.
Now the Universe is such a compound living thing: to observe,
therefore, its content is to be aware not less of its lower
elements than of the Providence which operates within it.
This Providence reaches to all that comes into being; its scope
therefore includes living things with their actions and states,
the total of their history at once overruled by the
Reason-Principle and yet subject in some degree to Necessity.
These, then, are presented as mingled both by their initial
nature and by the continuous process of their existence; and the
Seer is not able to make a perfect discrimination setting on the
one side Providence with all that happens under Providence and on
the other side what the substrate communicates to its product.
Such discrimination is not for a man, not for a wise man or a
divine man: one may say it is the prerogative of a god. Not
causes but facts lie in the Seer's province; his art is the
reading of the scriptures of Nature which tell of the ordered and
never condescend to the disorderly; the movement of the Universe
utters its testimony to him and, before men and things reveal
themselves, brings to light what severally and collectively they
are.
Here conspires with There and There with Here, elaborating
together the consistency and eternity of a Kosmos and by their
correspondences revealing the sequence of things to the trained
observer- for every form of divination turns upon
correspondences. Universal interdependence, there could not be,
but universal resemblance there must. This probably is the
meaning of the saying that Correspondences maintain the Universe.
This is a correspondence of inferior with inferior, of superior
with superior, eye with eye, foot with foot, everything with its
fellow and, in another order, virtue with right action and vice
with unrighteousness. Admit such correspondence in the All and we
have the possibility of prediction. If the one order acts on the
other, the relation is not that of maker to thing made- the two
are coeval- it is the interplay of members of one living being;
each in its own place and way moves as its own nature demands; to
every organ its grade and task, and to every grade and task its
effective organ.
|
|