|
If any one asks concerning the natures of the Lord if they are brought
under a continuous or discontinuous quantity, we will say that the
natures of the Lord are neither one body nor one superficies, nor one
line, nor time, nor place, so as to be reduced to a continuous
quantity. For these are the things that are reckoned continuously.
Further note that number deals with things that differ, and it is
quite impossible to enumerate things that differ from one another in no
respect: and just so far as they differ are they enumerated: for
instance, Peter and Paul are not counted separately in so far as they
are one. For since they are one in respect of their essence they
cannot be spoken of as two natures, but as they differ in respect of
subsistence they are spoken of as two subsistences. So that number
deals with differences, and just as the differing objects differ from
one another so far they are enumerated.
The natures of the Lord, then, are united without confusion so far
as regards subsistence, and they are divided without separation
according to the method and manner of difference. And it is not
according to the manner in which they are united that they are
enumerated, for it is not in respect of subsistence that we hold that
there are two natures of Christ: but according to the manner in which
they are divided without separation they are enumerated, for it is in
respect of the method and manner of difference that there are two
natures of Christ. For being united in subsistence and permeating one
another, they are united without confusion, each preserving throughout
its own peculiar and natural difference. Hence, since they are
enumerated according to the manner of difference, and that alone, they
must be brought under a discontinuous quantity.
Christ, therefore, is one, perfect God and perfect man: and Him
we worship along with the Father and the Spirit, with one obeisance,
adoring even His immaculate flesh and not holding that the flesh is not
meet for worship: for in fact it is worshipped in the one subsistence
of the Word, which indeed became subsistence for it. But in this we
do not do homage to that which is created. For we worship Him, not
as mere flesh, but as flesh united with divinity, and because His two
natures are brought under the one person and one subsistence of God the
Word. I fear to touch coal because of the fire bound up with the
wood. I worship the twofold nature of Christ because of the divinity
that is in Him bound up with flesh. For I do not introduce a fourth
person into the Trinity. God forbid! but I confess one person of
God the Word and of His flesh, and the Trinity remains Trinity,
even after the incarnation of the Word.
|
In reply to those who ask whether the two natures are brought under a
continuous or a discontinuous quantity.
|
|
The natures of the Lord are neither one body nor one superficies, nor
one line, nor place, nor time, so as to be brought under a continuous
quantity: for these are the things that are reckoned continuously.
But the natures of the Lord are united without confusion in respect of
subsistence, and are divided without separation according to the method
and manner of difference. And according to the manner in which they
are united they are not enumerated. For we do not say that the natures
of Christ are two subsistences or two in respect of subsistence. But
according to the manner in which they are divided without division, are
they enumerated. For there are two natures according to the method and
manner of difference. For being united in subsistence and permeating
one another they are united without confusion, neither having been
changed into the other, but each preserving its own natural difference
even after the union. For that which is created remained created, and
that which is uncreated, uncreated. By the manner of difference,
then, and in that alone, they are enumerated, and thus are brought
under discontinuous quantity. For things which differ from each other
in no respect cannot be enumerated, but just so far as they differ are
they enumerated; for instance, Peter and Paul are not enumerated in
those respects in which they are one: for being one in respect of their
essence they are not two natures nor are they so spoken of. But
inasmuch as they differ in subsistence they are spoken of as two
subsistences.So that difference is the cause of number.
|
|