|
Objection 1: It would seem that command belongs to irrational
animals. Because, according to Avicenna, "the power that commands
movement is the appetite; and the power that executes movement is in
the muscles and nerves." But both powers are in irrational animals.
Therefore command is to be found in irrational animals.
Objection 2: Further, the condition of a slave is that of one who
receives commands. But the body is compared to the soul as a slave to
his master, as the Philosopher says (Polit. i, 2). Therefore
the body is commanded by the soul, even in irrational animals, since
they are composed of soul and body.
Objection 3: Further, by commanding, man has an impulse towards an
action. But impulse to action is to be found in irrational animals,
as Damascene says (De Fide Orth. ii, 22). Therefore command
is to be found in irrational animals.
On the contrary, Command is an act of reason, as stated above
(Article 1). But in irrational animals there is no reason.
Neither, therefore, is there command.
I answer that, To command is nothing else than to direct someone to
do something, by a certain motion of intimation. Now to direct is the
proper act of reason. Wherefore it is impossible that irrational
animals should command in any way, since they are devoid of reason.
Reply to Objection 1: The appetitive power is said to command
movement, in so far as it moves the commanding reason. But this is
only in man. In irrational animals the appetitive power is not,
properly speaking, a commanding faculty, unless command be taken
loosely for motion.
Reply to Objection 2: The body of the irrational animal is
competent to obey; but its soul is not competent to command, because
it is not competent to direct. Consequently there is no ratio there of
commander and commanded; but only of mover and moved.
Reply to Objection 3: Impulse to action is in irrational animals
otherwise than in man. For the impulse of man to action arises from
the directing reason; wherefore his impulse is one of command. On the
other hand, the impulse of the irrational animal arises from natural
instinct; because as soon as they apprehend the fitting or the
unfitting, their appetite is moved naturally to pursue or to avoid.
Wherefore they are directed by another to act; and they themselves do
not direct themselves to act. Consequently in them is impulse but not
command.
|
|