|
Objection 1: It seems that it is possible to have patience without
grace. For the more his reason inclines to a thing, the more is it
possible for the rational creature to accomplish it. Now it is more
reasonable to suffer evil for the sake of good than for the sake of
evil. Yet some suffer evil for evil's sake, by their own virtue and
without the help of grace; for Augustine says (De Patientia iii)
that "men endure many toils and sorrows for the sake of the things they
love sinfully." Much more, therefore, is it possible for man,
without the help of grace, to bear evil for the sake of good, and this
is to be truly patient.
Objection 2: Further, some who are not in a state of grace have
more abhorrence for sinful evils than for bodily evils: hence some
heathens are related to have endured many hardships rather than betray
their country or commit some other misdeed. Now this is to be truly
patient. Therefore it seems that it is possible to have patience
without the help of grace.
Objection 3: Further, it is quite evident that some go through much
trouble and pain in order to regain health of the body. Now the health
of the soul is not less desirable than bodily health. Therefore in
like manner one may, without the help of grace, endure many evils for
the health of the soul, and this is to be truly patient.
On the contrary, It is written (Ps. 61:6): "From Him,"
i.e. from God, "is my patience."
I answer that, As Augustine says (De Patientia iv), "the
strength of desire helps a man to bear toil and pain: and no one
willingly undertakes to bear what is painful, save for the sake of that
which gives pleasure." The reason of this is because sorrow and pain
are of themselves displeasing to the soul, wherefore it would never
choose to suffer them for their own sake, but only for the sake of an
end. Hence it follows that the good for the sake of which one is
willing to endure evils, is more desired and loved than the good the
privation of which causes the sorrow that we bear patiently. Now the
fact that a man prefers the good of grace to all natural goods, the
loss of which may cause sorrow, is to be referred to charity, which
loves God above all things. Hence it is evident that patience, as a
virtue, is caused by charity, according to 1 Cor. 13:4,
"Charity is patient."
But it is manifest that it is impossible to have charity save through
grace, according to Rm. 5:5, "The charity of God is poured
forth in our hearts by the Holy Ghost Who is given to us."
Therefore it is clearly impossible to have patience without the help of
grace.
Reply to Objection 1: The inclination of reason would prevail in
human nature in the state of integrity. But in corrupt nature the
inclination of concupiscence prevails, because it is dominant in man.
Hence man is more prone to bear evils for the sake of goods in which
the concupiscence delights here and now, than to endure evils for the
sake of goods to come, which are desired in accordance with reason:
and yet it is this that pertains to true patience.
Reply to Objection 2: The good of a social virtue [FS,
Question 61, Article 5] is commensurate with human nature; and
consequently the human will can tend thereto without the help of
sanctifying grace, yet not without the help of God's grace [FS,
Question 109, Article 2]. On the other hand, the good of
grace is supernatural, wherefore man cannot tend thereto by a natural
virtue. Hence the comparison fails.
Reply to Objection 3: Even the endurance of those evils which a man
bears for the sake of his body's health, proceeds from the love a man
naturally has for his own flesh. Hence there is no comparison between
this endurance and patience which proceeds from a supernatural love.
|
|