|
Objection 1: It would seem that the first man did not know all
things. For if he had such knowledge it would be either by acquired
species, or by connatural species, or by infused species. Not,
however, by acquired species; for this kind of knowledge is acquired
by experience, as stated in Metaph. i, 1; and the first man had
not then gained experience of all things. Nor through connatural
species, because he was of the same nature as we are; and our soul,
as Aristotle says (De Anima iii, 4), is "like a clean tablet on
which nothing is written." And if his knowledge came by infused
species, it would have been of a different kind from ours, which we
acquire from things themselves.
Objection 2: Further, individuals of the same species have the same
way of arriving at perfection. Now other men have not, from the
beginning, knowledge of all things, but they acquire it in the course
of time according to their capacity. Therefore neither did Adam know
all things when he was first created.
Objection 3: Further, the present state of life is given to man in
order that his soul may advance in knowledge and merit; indeed, the
soul seems to be united to the body for that purpose. Now man would
have advanced in merit in that state of life; therefore also in
knowledge. Therefore he was not endowed with knowledge of all things.
On the contrary, Man named the animals (Gn. 2:20). But
names should be adapted to the nature of things. Therefore Adam knew
the animals' natures; and in like manner he was possessed of the
knowledge of all other things.
I answer that, In the natural order, perfection comes before
imperfection, as act precedes potentiality; for whatever is in
potentiality is made actual only by something actual. And since God
created things not only for their own existence, but also that they
might be the principles of other things; so creatures were produced in
their perfect state to be the principles as regards others. Now man
can be the principle of another man, not only by generation of the
body, but also by instruction and government. Hence, as the first
man was produced in his perfect state, as regards his body, for the
work of generation, so also was his soul established in a perfect state
to instruct and govern others.
Now no one can instruct others unless he has knowledge, and so the
first man was established by God in such a manner as to have knowledge
of all those things for which man has a natural aptitude. And such are
whatever are virtually contained in the first self-evident principles,
that is, whatever truths man is naturally able to know. Moreover, in
order to direct his own life and that of others, man needs to know not
only those things which can be naturally known, but also things
surpassing natural knowledge; because the life of man is directed to a
supernatural end: just as it is necessary for us to know the truths of
faith in order to direct our own lives. Wherefore the first man was
endowed with such a knowledge of these supernatural truths as was
necessary for the direction of human life in that state. But those
things which cannot be known by merely human effort, and which are not
necessary for the direction of human life, were not known by the first
man; such as the thoughts of men, future contingent events, and some
individual facts, as for instance the number of pebbles in a stream;
and the like.
Reply to Objection 1: The first man had knowledge of all things by
divinely infused species. Yet his knowledge was not different from
ours; as the eyes which Christ gave to the man born blind were not
different from those given by nature.
Reply to Objection 2: To Adam, as being the first man, was due
to a degree of perfection which was not due to other men, as is clear
from what is above explained.
Reply to Objection 3: Adam would have advanced in natural
knowledge, not in the number of things known, but in the manner of
knowing; because what he knew speculatively he would subsequently have
known by experience. But as regards supernatural knowledge, he would
also have advanced as regards the number of things known, by further
revelation; as the angels advance by further enlightenment. Moreover
there is no comparison between advance in knowledge and advance in
merit; since one man cannot be a principle of merit to another,
although he can be to another a principle of knowledge.
|
|