|
Objection 1: It seems that divine providence imposes necessity upon
things foreseen. For every effect that has a "per se" cause, either
present or past, which it necessarily follows, happens from
necessity; as the Philosopher proves (Metaph. vi, 7). But the
providence of God, since it is eternal, pre-exists; and the effect
flows from it of necessity, for divine providence cannot be
frustrated. Therefore divine providence imposes a necessity upon
things foreseen.
Objection 2: Further, every provider makes his work as stable as he
can, lest it should fail. But God is most powerful. Therefore He
assigns the stability of necessity to things provided.
Objection 3: Further, Boethius says (De Consol. iv, 6):
"Fate from the immutable source of providence binds together human
acts and fortunes by the indissoluble connection of causes." It seems
therefore that providence imposes necessity upon things foreseen.
On the contrary, Dionysius says that (Div. Nom. iv, 23) "to
corrupt nature is not the work of providence." But it is in the
nature of some things to be contingent. Divine providence does not
therefore impose any necessity upon things so as to destroy their
contingency.
I answer that, Divine providence imposes necessity upon some things;
not upon all, as some formerly believed. For to providence it belongs
to order things towards an end. Now after the divine goodness, which
is an extrinsic end to all things, the principal good in things
themselves is the perfection of the universe; which would not be, were
not all grades of being found in things. Whence it pertains to divine
providence to produce every grade of being. And thus it has prepared
for some things necessary causes, so that they happen of necessity;
for others contingent causes, that they may happen by contingency,
according to the nature of their proximate causes.
Reply to Objection 1: The effect of divine providence is not only
that things should happen somehow; but that they should happen either
by necessity or by contingency. Therefore whatsoever divine providence
ordains to happen infallibly and of necessity happens infallibly and of
necessity; and that happens from contingency, which the plan of divine
providence conceives to happen from contingency.
Reply to Objection 2: The order of divine providence is
unchangeable and certain, so far as all things foreseen happen as they
have been foreseen, whether from necessity or from contingency.
Reply to Objection 3: That indissolubility and unchangeableness of
which Boethius speaks, pertain to the certainty of providence, which
fails not to produce its effect, and that in the way foreseen; but
they do not pertain to the necessity of the effects. We must remember
that properly speaking 'necessary' and "contingent" are consequent
upon being, as such. Hence the mode both of necessity and of
contingency falls under the foresight of God, who provides universally
for all being; not under the foresight of causes that provide only for
some particular order of things.
|
|