|
Objection 1: It would seem that corporal almsdeeds have not a
spiritual effect. For no effect exceeds its cause. But spiritual
goods exceed corporal goods. Therefore corporal almsdeeds have no
spiritual effect.
Objection 2: Further, the sin of simony consists in giving the
corporal for the spiritual, and it is to be utterly avoided.
Therefore one ought not to give alms in order to receive a spiritual
effect.
Objection 3: Further, to multiply the cause is to multiply the
effect. If therefore corporal almsdeeds cause a spiritual effect, the
greater the alms, the greater the spiritual profit, which is contrary
to what we read (Lk. 21:3) of the widow who cast two brass mites
into the treasury, and in Our Lord's own words "cast in more than
. . . all." Therefore bodily almsdeeds have no spiritual effect.
On the contrary, It is written (Ecclus. 17:18): "The alms
of a man . . . shall preserve the grace of a man as the apple of the
eye."
I answer that, Corporal almsdeeds may be considered in three ways.
First, with regard to their substance, and in this way they have
merely a corporal effect, inasmuch as they supply our neighbor's
corporal needs. Secondly, they may be considered with regard to their
cause, in so far as a man gives a corporal alms out of love for God
and his neighbor, and in this respect they bring forth a spiritual
fruit, according to Ecclus. 29:13, 14: "Lose thy money for
thy brother . . . place thy treasure in the commandments of the Most
High, and it shall bring thee more profit than gold."
Thirdly, with regard to the effect, and in this way again, they have
a spiritual fruit, inasmuch as our neighbor, who is succored by a
corporal alms, is moved to pray for his benefactor; wherefore the
above text goes on (Ecclus. 29:15): "Shut up alms in the
heart of the poor, and it shall obtain help for thee from all evil."
Reply to Objection 1: This argument considers corporal almsdeeds as
to their substance.
Reply to Objection 2: He who gives an alms does rot intend to buy a
spiritual thing with a corporal thing, for he knows that spiritual
things infinitely surpass corporal things, but he intends to merit a
spiritual fruit through the love of charity.
Reply to Objection 3: The widow who gave less in quantity, gave
more in proportion; and thus we gather that the fervor of her charity,
whence corporal almsdeeds derive their spiritual efficacy, was
greater.
|
|