|
The Athenians, forced to witness the expatriation from Boeotia of
their friends the Plataeans (who had sought an asylum with
themselves), forced also to listen to the supplications of the
Thespiaeans (who begged them not to suffer them to be robbed of their
city), could no longer regard the Thebans with favour;[33] though, when
it came to a direct declaration of war, they were checked in part by a
feeling of shame, and partly by considerations of expediency. Still,
to go hand in hand with them, to be a party to their proceedings, this
they absolutely refused, now that they saw them marching against time-
honoured friends of the city like the Phocians, and blotting out
states whose loyalty in the great Persian war was conspicuous no less
than their friendship to Athens. Accordingly the People passed a
decree to make peace; but in the first instance they sent an embassy
to Thebes, inviting that state to join them if it pleased them on an
embassy which they proposed to send to Lacedaemon to treat of peace.
In the next place they despatched such an embassy on their own
account. Among the commissioners appointed were Callias the son of
Hipponicus, Autocles the son of Strombichides, Demostratus the son of
Aristophon, Aristocles, Cephisodotus,[34] Melanopus, and Lycaethus.
B.C. 371. [These were formally introduced to the Deputies of the
Lacedaemonians and the allies.[35]] Nor ought the name of Callistratus
to be omitted. That statesman and orator was present. He had obtained
furlough from Iphicrates on an undertaking either to send money for
the fleet or to arrange a peace. Hence his arrival in Athens and
transactions in behalf of peace. After being introduced to the
assembly[36] of the Lacedaemonians and to the allies, Callias,[37] who
was the dadouchos (or torch-holder) in the mysteries, made the first
speech. He was a man just as well pleased to praise himself as to hear
himself praised by others. He opened the proceedings as follows:
"Lacedaemonians, the duty of representing you as proxenos at Athens is
a privilege which I am not the first member of my family to enjoy; my
father's father held it as an heirloom of our family and handed it
down as a heritage to his descendants. If you will permit me, I should
like to show you the disposition of my fatherland towards yourselves.
If in times of war she chooses us as her generals, so when her heart
is set upon quiet she sends us out as her messengers of peace. I
myself have twice already[38] stood here to treat for conclusion of
war, and on both embassies succeeded in arranging a mutually agreeable
peace. Now for the third time I am come, and I flatter myself that to-
day again I shall obtain a reconciliation, and on grounds
exceptionally just. My eyes bear witness that our hearts are in
accord; you and we alike are pained at the effacement of Plataeae and
Thespiae. Is it not then reasonable that out of agreement should
spring concord rather than discord? It is never the part, I take it,
of wise men to raise the standard of war for the sake of petty
differences; but where there is nothing but unanimity they must be
marvellous folk who refuse the bond of peace. But I go further. It
were just and right on our parts even to refuse to bear arms against
each other; since, as the story runs, the first strangers to whom our
forefather Triptolemus showed the unspeakable mystic rites of Demeter
and Core, the mother and the maiden, were your ancestors;--I speak of
Heracles, the first founder of your state, and of your two citizens,
the great twin sons of Zeus--and to Peloponnesus first he gave as a
gift the seed of Demeter's corn-fruits. How, then, can it be just or
right either that you should come and ravage the corn crops of those
from whom you got the sacred seed of corn, or that we should not
desire that they to whom the gift was given should share abundantly of
this boon? But if, as it would seem, it is a fixed decree of heaven
that war shall never cease among men, yet ought we--your people and
our people--to be as slow as possible to begin it, and being in it, as
swift as possible to bring it to an end."
After him Autocles[39] spoke: he was of repute as a versatile lawyer
and orator, and addressed the meeting as follows: "Lacedaemonians, I
do not conceal from myself that what I am about to say is not
calculated to please you, but it seems to me that, if you wish the
friendship which we are cementing to last as long as possible, we are
wise to show each other the underlying causes of our wars. Now, you
are perpetually saying that the states ought to be independent; but it
is you yourselves who most of all stand in the way of independence--
your first and last stipulation with the allied states being that they
should follow you whithersoever you choose to lead; and yet what has
this principle of follow-my-leader got to do with independent
action?[40] Again, you pick quarrels without consulting your allies,
and lead them against those whom you account enemies; so that in many
cases, with all their vaunted independence, they are forced to march
against their greatest friends; and, what is still more opposed to
independence than all else, you are for ever setting up here your
decarchies and there your thirty commissioners, and your chief aim in
appointing these officers and governors seems to be, not that they
should fulfil their office and govern legally, but that they should be
able to keep the cities under their heels by sheer force. So that it
looks as if you delighted in despotisms rather than free
constitutions. Let us go back to the date[41] at which the Persian king
enjoined the independence of the states. At that time you made no
secret of your conviction that the Thebans, if they did not suffer
each state to govern itself and to use the laws of its own choice,
would be failing to act in the spirit of the king's rescript. But no
sooner had you got hold of Cadmeia than you would not suffer the
Thebans themselves to be independent. Now, if the maintenance of
friendship be an object, it is no use for people to claim justice from
others while they themselves are doing all they can to prove the
selfishness of their aims."
These remarks were received in absolute silence, yet in the hearts of
those who were annoyed with Lacedaemon they stirred pleasure. After
Autocles spoke Callistratus: "Trespasses, men of Lacedaemon, have been
committed on both sides, yours and ours, I am free to confess; but
still it is not my view that because a man has done wrong we can never
again have dealings with him. Experience tells me that no man can go
very far without a slip, and it seems to me that sometimes the
transgressor by reason of his transgression becomes more tractable,
especially if he be chastened through the error he has committed, as
has been the case with us. And so on your own case I see that
ungenerous acts have sometimes reaped their own proper reward: blow
has been met by counter-blow; and as a specimen I take the seizure of
the Cadmeia in Thebes. To-day, at any rate, the very cities whose
independence you strove for have, since your unrighteous treatment of
Thebes, fallen one and all of them again into her power.[42] We are
schooled now, both of us, to know that grasping brings not gain. We
are prepared, I hope, to be once more moderate under the influence of
a mutual friendship. Some, I know, in their desire to render our
peace[43] abortive accuse us falsely, as though we were come hither,
not seeking friendship, but because we dread the arrival of some[44]
Antalcidas with moneys from the king. But consider, what arrant
nonsense they talk! Was it not, pray, the great king who demanded that
all the states in Hellas should be independent? and what have we
Athenians, who are in full agreement with the king, both in word and
deed, to fear from him? Or is it conceivable that he prefers spending
money in making others great to finding his favourite projects
realised without expense?
"Well! what is it really that has brought us here? No especial need or
difficulty in our affairs. That you may discover by a glance at our
maritime condition, or, if you prefer, at the present posture of our
affairs on land. Well, then, how does the matter stand? It is obvious
that some of our allies please us no better than they please you;[45]
and, possibly, in return for your former preservation of us, we may be
credited with a desire to point out to you the soundness of our
policy.
"But, to revert once more to the topic of expediency and common
interests. It is admitted, I presume, that, looking at the states
collectively, half support your views, half ours; and in every single
state one party is for Sparta and another for Athens. Suppose, then,
we were to shake hands, from what quarter can we reasonably anticipate
danger and trouble? To put the case in so many words, so long as you
are our friends no one can vex us by land; no one, whilst we are your
supports, can injure you by sea. Wars like tempests gather and grow to
a head from time to time, and again they are dispelled. That we all
know. Some future day, if not to-day, we shall crave, both of us, for
peace. Why, then, need we wait for that moment, holding on until we
expire under the multitude of our ills, rather than take time by the
forelock and, before some irremediable mischief betide, make peace? I
cannot admire the man who, because he has entered the lists and has
scored many a victory and obtained to himself renown, is so eaten up
with the spirit of rivalry that he must needs go on until he is beaten
and all his training is made futile. Nor again do I praise the gambler
who, if he makes one good stroke of luck, insists on doubling the
stakes. Such conduct in the majority of cases must end in absolute
collapse. Let us lay the lesson of these to heart, and forbear to
enter into any such lists as theirs for life or death; but, while we
are yet in the heyday of our strength and fortune, shake hands in
mutual amity. So assuredly shall we through you and you through us
attain to an unprecedented pinnacle of glory throughout Hellas."
The arguments of the speakers were approved, and the Lacedaemonians
passed a resolution to accept peace on a threefold basis: the
withdrawal of the governors from the cities,[46] the disbanding of
armaments naval and military, and the guarantee of independence to the
states. "If any state transgressed these stipulations, it lay at the
option of any power whatsoever to aid the states so injured, while,
conversely, to bring such aid was not compulsory on any power against
its will." On these terms the oaths were administered and accepted by
the Lacedaemonians on behalf of themselves and their allies, and by
the Athenians and their allies separately state by state. The Thebans
had entered their individual name among the states which accepted the
oaths, but their ambassadors came the next day with instructions to
alter the name of the signatories, substituting for Thebans
Boeotians.[47] But Agesilaus answered to this demand that he would
alter nothing of what they had in the first instance sworn to and
subscribed. If they did not wish to be included in the treaty, he was
willing to erase their name at their bidding. So it came to pass that
the rest of the world made peace, the sole point of dispute being
confined to the Thebans; and the Athenians came to the conclusion that
there was a fair prospect of the Thebans being now literally
decimated.[48] As to the Thebans themselves, they retired from Sparta
in utter despondency.
|
|